Jump to content

J. Scott Portingale

Basic Member
  • Posts

    39
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by J. Scott Portingale

  1. The lenses are sharp, a little like UltraPrimes. Personally I prefer Cooke over Zeiss, you need to test and see if you like them, they do the job perfectly well & they are not very expensive to buy. I am testing some again soon.

     

    Thanks, I try to pull some tests off. I thought they may be sharp seeing as how they were designed for HD. I'll be using them in Canada in January. I hope they handle cold well.

  2. Hello all,

     

    Just wondering if anyone has shot 35mm film with the new RED lenses. What were your results like? How does it preform wide open (1.8)? I have access to a complete set of RED primes and a ARRI 3 camera. If anyone knows the results of any decent tests that are online a link would be greatly appreciated.

     

    Thanks.

    -Scott

  3. I have starting to shoot RAW with a digital SLR when I shoot time-lapse, and have encountered a problem in post.

     

    I edit the RAW media (crop, color, exposure, ect…) in Lightroom2, and export to jpeg in a separate folder. The jpegs reflect all my edits, but as soon as I assemble them in Quicktime Pro, or Final Cut. I loose a lot of the vibrancy of the colors. I'm shooting in RAW so I have more versatility in editing, but something goes wrong when I assemble the jpegs. Anyone else experience this problem? What software do you use to assemble the photos?

     

    I have attached a screen photograph of what the two color representations look like.

    The shot on the left is what the assembly looks like (Quick Time application). The shot on the right is what the original edited photograph looks like (Preview application).

    post-17836-1247409901.jpg

  4. It's funny you mentioned Kevin, because we just had a message exchange a few hours ago in the visual effects forum pertaining to frame rate/shutter angle exposure relationships. He used large tungsten lights for his slow-mo work which I don't have access to on my budget. I do have access to HMIS (on a discount), but I'm not sure how they will work at frame rates over 1000fps. I think I'll start sourcing out 5ks and 10ks and pay the extra. I don't want to risk having poor results.

  5. OK I just found this data, but it relates to 24fps.

    what about 96fps or 150fps?

    Is there a downlodable table out there I can refer to?

     

    SLS 4 = 1440 degrees (try doing that with a film camera!)

    SLS 2 = 720 degrees

    1/24 = 360 degrees

    1/48 = 180 degrees

    1/96 = 90 degrees

    1/192 = 45 degrees

    1/384 = 22.5 degrees

    1/768 = 11.25 degrees

  6. I am fairly new to experimental cinematography, and I was wondering if there were any links to videos of slow motion in tandem with acute shutter angles that would also give technical details stating what angle they used, and what frame rate they shot. I am trying to figure out what angle I should shoot before rolling film through a camera at fast speeds. I will most likely shoot as fast as the camera will let me, but the angle still confuses me.

     

    Actually here's a better question... What is 10degrees equivalent to in seconds? 1/250? 1/500?

     

     

    ie: knife through head of lettuce (96fps) beads of water with clear tack sharp edges.

  7. I am shooting a scene that occurs in a darkroom on colour neg 500T and I want to expose it with an amber safe light look whilst exposing for the light source from the enlarger. My plan is to light the entire room with one diffused gelled light source and fill certain objects with gelled 150s. What gel should I use? Is there another and possibly an easier, or better way?

×
×
  • Create New...