Just found out that it is a 37% Tax Credit. Also, the scenery does not look the same. We can offer a range between city, beach, ocean, mountains, volcanoes, deserts, tundra, mining towns, glacier ice fields, and temperate rainforest, and much more.
I'm not actually quite sold on the idea yet. I don't believe that we have the structural infrastructure to handle a large scale production yet. The danger we might run into is the same problem happening with the New Mexico Film program, where they're getting the productions, but don't have the infrastructure to handle it. We need to proceed slowly. It is the truth that it will still be more expensive than Canada, but I think that if you truly wish to show Alaska, you should show Alaska, anyone that has shot there knows that the true scenery cannot be replaced or substituted. Granted, I don't see a film being shot up here that takes place all in city, this is very much a place for the man vs. wilderness or himself type of project. But I could be wrong.