anroop mri
-
Posts
15 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by anroop mri
-
-
5d mark ii
in D-SLR
Hello everybody,i am a director planning to shoot a feature on 5d ii ,i know a little about 35mm and red but never tried 5d,many of my friends are saying i can easily save a lot of money if i do it on 5d,but the thing thts bothering me is, nobody is able to tell how sucessfully i can get the film look on 5d,some are saying ,i would have digital look whatever i do and some say it depends,i will be very thankful to them who can guide me in the right direction,thank you.
-
Hello everyone,can anybody please tell me wht is the pipe like thing which is used by directors on a set ?is it used to to see the frame ,but why that tube if they can directly see from cam viewfinder?what does it do?does it give u the accuracy ,or how do u use it?
-
Thank you rick,and i thank each and everyone who are contributing to this question.
-
I spent 4 years in College, literally, every year, watching that same damned steps sequence from Potemptken.... so it's gotta mean something.
Camera motion, as mentioned is very important, and you really need to ask yourself why. Often, I'll figure out the "grammar" of the film with the director first in how it regards camera motion, and try to stick to that.
For another reference whose movement I really enjoyed, look at Amilie.
thank you adrian,more advice please.
-
You need to watch a lot of different films from different eras and different countries. The more you watch, the better you will understand what works and what doesn't. Start with the silent era. Since your questions apply to both camera-work and editing, you should watch Sergei Eisenstein's Battleship Potemkin. Take a look at Ingmar Bergman's stuff and Kubrick's as well.
And just start to pay attention to the camera-work and editing you see in every film you watch.
Thats very kind of you bill and brian ,this info is really helpful.and thank you for the good advice on how i should also see into editing.please keep advicing .
-
There is no real rule for moving the camera. Very often, it follows the characters. Other times, camera movement is motivated by the story or what the characters may be feeling internally, or to pan a landscape, etc. Nowadays, there seems to be an overuse of camera movement. As a filmmaker, you should always ask yourself "why" you are moving the camera. If it's only because you think it looks cool, that's a bad reason.
There are numerous books on cinematography. Check Amazon.
Thank you very much bill,and can u please tell if there should be a connection in the movement from previous shot to the next shot?
-
Hello everyone,i am an aspiring filmmaker and never got an exact answer for creating a movement(why does a camera move)is there a basic rule for the movement for example if a character moves the camera may travel with him or her,but sometimes when evrything is still the camera dollys to a close up and so on,so can somebody please tell me wht is the basic rule for moving camera?and are there anybooks to explain just movement of the camera?thank you.
-
hey thank you very much,u r truly a genius
-
thank you the great psychic,please read your future first
-
Thank you for the advice,if u cant answer properly or dont know the answer please do not reply ,these kind of replies wont help anything
thank you
-
Hello everybody,can u please tell me the difference between 8mm,16mm,35mm and 65mm cameras and what do they do?and can u also please tell me visually wht difference it makes by usage of different formats,and if am shooting for the first time on film which format is best for me
thank you
-
david can u please tell me how u can do that ?because i changed from anroop to anroopmri and i dont understand how else i can change it,if u want me to add more to my name please give me a name and i will change it,thank you ver much
-
can anybody help me with this topic???????????
-
i want to direct ,so my question here is how to direct,wht is direction actually,what crafts should director know,wht are the basic methods,thank you
5d mark ii
in D-SLR
Posted
First of all thank you adrian and travis,@ adrian film look i meant, was that on film stock image looks matte,where as on didgital it looks more glossy or shiny or also can say more mettalic, i dont know how else to explain,but for many years our eyes have been so used to watch films shot on film formats which gives it a look ,when i shot on digital it felt more like video than film ,not exactly but i am just trying to put all my words together for u to understand what my intention or need is ,and to be more clear i dont think audience really care about what we shoot on ,but in the end i dont want them to feel it would have been better if he shot on film (kind of comment)hope u got my point ,thank you.