brad Hagen

I looked at in in 720p mode on an ordinary Gateway FPD1810 computer monitor at home. Obviously they've raised the black level in timing to show us what's happening in the bottom end. Under those circumstances, the lower noise of the MX perhaps lets us see the quantization banding better. But that's throughout, maybe a little more visible around 1:51. There's no big clearly exceptional artifact right at that time -- at least on my computer.

 

We're kidding ourselves looking at such tests in little postage stamp windows on computers. They need to be seen in front projection on a big screen, preferably 4K.

 

 

 

-- J.S.

I can make the uncompressed TIFF images available if folks want to see them. That may clear some (pun intended) of this up. Let me know. B

Mysterium X vs. Mysterium RED shoot out – the results

We posted some tests comparing the RED M v. MX chips. We own two RED cameras, and held one of our cameras back and so we could do some comparative tests between the two sensors. Our tests are informal (no charts) and include several scenes of the M v MX shooting the same scenes. You can see the clips and some stills on our website site. http://www.shootwithred.com

Mysterium X vs. Mysterium RED shoot out – the results

We posted some tests comparing the RED M v. MX chips. We own two RED cameras, and held one of our cameras back and so we could do some comparative tests between the two sensors. Our tests are informal (no charts) and include several scenes of the M v MX shooting the same scenes. You can see the clips and some stills on our website site. http://www.shootwithred.com