But in terms of detail, mainly with a 4K scan of Super-16 you are capturing more of the smaller grains in the image but the actual image itself isn't going to look any sharper.
Is this not often used as an argument not to scan 4K for(s)16? More grain is visible, which makes the image look harsher. Do you find that to be the case, David?
2016 - 2K or 4K for 16mm?
in Post Production
Posted
Is this not often used as an argument not to scan 4K for(s)16? More grain is visible, which makes the image look harsher. Do you find that to be the case, David?