Gabriel Devereux

1 hour ago, Uli Meyer said:

The world is still moving. Just because it isn't moving the way you are used to, doesn't mean it isn't.

 

I'm afraid that a lot of people will use lower death rates as an argument that the drastic measurements weren't necessary instead of recognizing that this is what helped keep them low.

Yesterday a 13 year old girl died. What do you think her parents would say?

I think we can all agree that you can recover from economic hardship. You can't recover from death.

Yes it’s definitely moving, but you completely neglected the fact one million people are relying on government package from this in Australia! That’s 1/27th of the population. It has apparently ‘only just begun’ our methods are not sustainable long term and even already they are questionable. 

People die from economic hardship. A fair amount of people already die from economic hardship. Figures that in a weird saddening way make the Covid deaths look meaningless. 9 million people starve each year and a fair amount children. I don’t want to point out the obvious but if they had money... they’d buy food. So ya get where I’m coming from here.

A 13 year old girl died from Corona yesterday, that is indeed saddening but I don’t see your point? Yesterday I imagine many 13 year old girls globally died from the sex trade. From starvation, fighting, drugs etc, notice how I’ve only stated what would be easily preventable deaths. So I do agree with you especially on how what we’ve done has dropped the amount of deaths. Your definetly right about that. What I’m saying is that economic hardship is fatal. Also the whole ‘13 year old girl dying thing’ is just looking for fear. 

I personally don’t think I should be discussing this topic with you. I’m mostly focused on how this will effect the industry we work in. Call me narrow minded but I think that’s what this thread is about, not about are thoughts on how the global crisis is killing children. I can’t help that child yet I can help mine by getting back to work.

2 hours ago, Uli Meyer said:

Trump is a fool. Nobody is "hiding". Nobody wants this. People are trying to prevent unnecessary deaths. Again, show some courage ffs.

Do give every point a chance. The idea is we can’t all courageously hide away. We need to keep the world moving, in our world everything relies on something it can not simply halt. The world must continue. In Australia currently one million people are expected to be relying on government packages. These packages aren’t coming through until April the 27th however today they decided to pretty much close all non-essential businesses and gatherings. Our shoot included of course however in the grand scheme of things that’s nothing. 

Currently we have 8 deaths. Now we are definetly being preemptive, but at what stage is it going too far? I’m probably not seeing the bigger picture but one million people relying on money that is more than a month away for something that hasn’t seem to hit us yet. People lining up in front of Centrelink (our public service centres) like something you see in movies from the days of serious communism in Europe. People are oddly desperate, the first world Australian kind of desperate yet still desperate in their own way. 

The majority of deaths are from the elderly aged 70 and over, one 86 and I believe even one 90+ year old woman. We are being preemptive yet possible a slight over reaction has occurred. 

Just my opinion and I’m following all the rules. I have an opinion yet I do still follow the experts advice as I like the majority of us are mostly artists and are rather uneducated on the topic of a pandemic or healthcare in general. 

7 hours ago, Manu Delpech said:

Did you read anything I said, did you watch the video? Have you been watching what WHO and the CDC have been saying? IT'S NOT FOR YOU. It's for others. It's not fear mongering. Take a look at her calculations, and no, she's not the only one who came up with those. There are not nearly enough ventilators in the US, nor in any country to take on the demand. 

SOCIAL DISTANCING is to save lives. You might not give a flying f*** but with that attitude of yours, if you do not practice social distancing, you might wound up getting infected and infecting someone who will infect others at risk and you might end up being responsible for who knows how many deaths. You might also have a family, older relatives. Are the dots connecting in your head? 

We've got far too many idiots (like those clowns in Florida spring breaking, or those other clowns in the UK in pubs) not following the guidelines, not giving a crap. There were one or two such idiots in South Korea who did so, guess what? They're responsible for 80% of the cases in SK. 

Yes but this is a short term solution. I personally don’t have the money or resources for a 1.5 year isolation waiting for a vaccine or for this to ‘go away’. So, what’s next? 

For an upcoming shoot we will be shooting on an Ursa Mini Pro. The director wishes for several shots of ‘sun in frame’. 

This is an example from Y Tu Mama -

With this I have two questions. 

I have always had the idea in my head that the sun should rarely be in frame as it can damage the lens and camera sensor. The director also wishes for me to have the sun in frame in mid morning shots as well so less atmosphere. Would this damage the camera even if properly exposed for? A lot of the shots the director has shown for influence comes from the tree of life and the Revenant with significant back lighting. I understand Emmanuel Lubezki shot digital on the revenant (Of course on a different camera) so I imagine that having the sun in shot won’t damage the digital sensor? However I’d like to make sure!

My second question is how would one go about achieving the example shot I’ve given. I understand it’s almost late sunset-sunrise but the lack of flare and just the sun not being an overexposed mess and the actors not being in complete silhouette amazes me. Am I missing something? Is it waiting for the right amount of atmosphere?

I apologise for the rookie questions and the poor grammar! I’ve written this on my iPad.

Gabe

The issue with now compared to previous years is that it’s harder to be a pioneer. To be a pioneer you are not loved, nor celebrated until it’s a success. Most people who want to be a celebrated director, cinematographer, actor etc... don’t want to take that risk. If you were to suggest something outlandish nobody would fund it and critics would kill it.

Money and opinion may be the two most harmful parts of modern day art. If Van Gogh new his paintings were going to be priceless and bring him eternal fame would of he painted them differently? Not show his bad sides, yaknow hide the fact he cut off his ear. But no he was completely open and expressed himself as at no point would he ever of thought anybody else would see his work (considering the fact he only sold one painting throughout his entire life).

I had a thought if you got a director, actors, DP everyone. To shoot a film and release it in 50 to 100 years when they are all dead or forgotten would they shoot it differently? Especially nowadays film making is more confined. We are so vane and need to fill our egos with awards we wouldn’t dare cross the line. Also because we are so conditioned in society we wouldn’t even know the where the line is to cross. We believe outlandishness crosses the line. If one shoots a film with endless carnage and nudity more than anyone else has before that’ll make them stand out. However if anything that’s just feeding today’s society. 

I do still believe there are still great films being made. Call me ‘arty and pompous’ but I did enjoy La La land, Birdman, Sicario and many other films released throughout the recent years. Honey Boy, 1917 and I did enjoy Parasite, all great films and all relatively new. 1917 for more of its technical achievements however still gripping. I also truly enjoyed the Joker, it played on my mind. When do we find it acceptable to kill people?

It’s always easier to be a critic. 
“A man is a critic when he cannot be an artist, in the same way that a man becomes an informer when he cannot be a soldier”

Just a rambling of my thoughts.

I’d buy a used HMI. I’ve purchased one before. All it needs is a new bulb and sometimes if they come with a old ballast (magnetic) I buy it a new electronic one. 

However I’ve purchased only one 1.2 HMI par Arrisun in the past second hand. It was for 1300 AUD. About 850 USD on eBay. Now some could say ‘risk factor’. Which there is. However if your buying a second hand Arri HMI and want a quicker return on investment I’d find a better deal. Also the factor of ‘do you need it’. A 1.2k is a great light. However it sounds like you already have a pretty strong package if your buying a HMI to let’s say punch through a window. I’d buy something bigger than a 1.2k. 

6 hours ago, Stuart Brereton said:

Your argument here seems to be about the need for higher resolution capture devices, not scanners. Audio engineers use 96kHz to capture sound from the original source, to try to preserve all of its subtleties. With film, that initial capture of information was done when the film was exposed, and is limited by the resolving power of the film. Once you’ve scanned it at a high enough resolution to capture that information, there’s nothing more to be had. You can’t create information where there is none. Ok, an 8k scan means you won’t have to upsample it in the future, but in a sense, you’ve already done that by stretching 4K of information to fill an 8k file.

You’re right that technology will quickly become fast enough and cheap enough that there will be no reason not to scan at higher resolutions, but that doesn’t mean it will be necessary.

The issue with digital is that what once was amazing is now last gen. I remember watching avatar going ‘wow this looks amazing’. I rewatched it the other night thinking ‘it sort of looks more and more like video game graphics’. I remember with 720p, it was revolutionary. Why would anyone need more than that? Now a 720p visually looks poorer in quality. As the human eye evolves, and it is evolving. The difference between 8k and 4K will grow. The difference between 4K and 1080p will grow. The thing with digital is that if you watch a 480p video. The pixels are a harsh lapse of quality. They are tiny box’s, no real smoothness to them. Film however even though arguably doesn’t have more than 4K worth of information. The sort of lapse of quality is smooth. It isn’t janky like digital. Scanning at 8k does future proof it. Yes technically you’d be upressing it by a fair bit but like I said it’s different. One of the reasons why I love film. 

This however is complete opinion with very little fact. More personal taste than anything else.

5 hours ago, Mark Kenfield said:

The best thing you can do, is use your time on the location recce to track down the fuse box, and isolate which circuits feed which power sockets throughout the place, so that you can spread the load accordingly. 

Use tape to mark things out clearly in the fuse box, and draw a little map of everything for your gaffer (if they're not at the recce with you).

That way you can pre-plan where you're going to feed each lamp from, and can save you a tonne of time and trouble on the day.

Thank You! On my recce we didn’t have a ‘plug tester’ (I don’t know what they are called exactly but I’m familiar). I asked my gaffer to go around with a small plug in lamp to isolate which plug to which fuse. I do have one question though. Inside the fuse box on the breakers/fuses they had a 20A rating. So I could run 4000 watts off one circuit I’d imagine? Better to give it enough ‘breathing room’ in case the lamps spike on turn on? Or is that only with HMI’s.

3 hours ago, Phil Rhodes said:

Quoted because it's important. If it takes fuses, absolutely ensure you have the right fuses in the right ratings for that particular type of fusebox, and know where everything goes. Then, if there is a problem, it's a five minute job, rather than two hours while someone tracks down a fuse. Many places in developed countries will have resettable breakers these days, but best to know.

Yes! I was on a recce with my gaffer and the fuse box of one location didn’t have resettable breakers! I was in shock as I always considered Australia to be rather ahead. Like you just just a drive to the closest town takes an hour up here. Thanks for the reminder!

Thank you all! 

Ill go through the circuits of the house with one of my electricians and map it all out. I think we have one 20A plug as well so a lot of leeway. I’m pretty sure all are sockets will be alright, Australia is pretty safety conscious as a camera. If a forest fire does break out, at least we’ve had a lot of practice in the last few months!

Gabe

Dear Forum members, 

For an upcoming project in far North Queensland Australia I’m planning on using several 2k and 1k mole fresnels. I recently moved back to Australia and have had the delight of finding out that the plugs use 10Amp instead of the regular 15 to 20 I’m used to. My instant thinking is that first of all we do not have the budget for rewiring a 20 amp circuit for each location (which I was told is a possibility), or buying and moving a generator up here so I am somewhat relying on mains power. 

After some research I found that although the amps are lower, Australia’s mains run a 240v instead of 110v. So using the calculation, watt = amps x voltage, means that the each circuit could sustain a 2k light? I am no electrician so I think this would work but I’d rather ask and make sure than be wrong and have 2k’s that I cannot use. I have always been told that a 2k Fresnel requires 20 amps. 

Another question I was worried about. Working up here a lot of the wiring, even mains wiring is temperamental. I have run a 2k off a house plug before yet I am wondering what is the worst that could possibly happen (within reason). There will always be circuit breakers but are there any extra precautions I could take to minimise the risk? 

Thanks in advance and I apologise for my poor grammar I wrote this on my phone.

Gabe