Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags '35mm Negative Expired Old Lab'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.

  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Cinematography Forums
    • General Discussion
    • Cine Marketplace
    • Cameras Systems and Formats
    • Lighting for Film & Video
    • Camera Operating & Gear
    • Camera Assistant / DIT & Gear
    • Grip & Rigging
    • Visual Effects Cinematography
    • Post Production
    • Students, New Filmmakers, Film Schools and Programs
    • Lenses & Lens Accessories
    • Film Stocks & Processing
    • Books for the Cinematographer
    • Cinematographers
    • Directors and Directing
    • In Production / Behind the Scenes
    • On Screen / Reviews & Observations
    • Business Practices & Producing
    • Camera & Lighting Equipment Resources
    • Jobs, Resumes, and Reels
    • Please Critique My Work
    • Cinematography News
    • Sound
    • Off Topic
    • Accessories (Deprecated SubForum)
    • Regional Cinematography Groups

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End

Last Updated

  • Start

    End

Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End

Group

Occupation

Location

My Gear

Specialties

Found 1 result

  1. Alex Reid
    I am shooting a small project on Monday with old 35mm stock that I have saved since I was a loader. I just got the densitometry results back from the lab and as expected, the faster stocks have come back quite heavy, e.g. some Vision 500T came back +0.43 + 0.52 + 0.52 above the AIM RGB Densitometry numbers. Unfortunately I don't have time to shoot some tests with it, so any advice would be hugely appreciated. Should I treat each +0.10 off AIM roughly as 1 stop? Therefore if its averaging +0.50 above AIM, then I should overexpose it by 5 stops? Gratefully, Alex Reid.
×
×
  • Create New...