Karel Bata Posted January 17, 2009 Share Posted January 17, 2009 I read this elsewhere and thought I'd share it: "First it's a myth that Youtube converts "everything" you upload.If you work within certain constraints Youtube will save itself some unnecessary effort and fastforward your video straight past the encode que and just use exactly what you upload.So no waiting for your video to come online - it appears within a few seconds.To pass this test your uploaded video should first already be a suitably encoded Flash video file - FLV.Next - Youtube works on an "average bit rate". So other than getting your video in to Flash format (if not already) that's all it's really bothered about. It wants a smooth playback - avoiding undue buffering.So - if your uploaded video file is FLV and has an average bit rate below the Youtube target (think it was 300kbs) - you get fasttracked - no encoding!This opens up an interesting loop hole that can be exploited where you can encode your own FLV at a much higher bit rate than Youtube would normally use - and trick Youtube into allowing that video untouched straight online.As a test using this technique I encoded a video that has such a high bit rate (700kbs) it can't actually play without loads of buffering on most fast connections (exactly what Youtube is seeking to avoid). No purpose in this other than to prove the video had its bit-rate intact and had by-passed the re-encode que.You may already see where this is going??If your video is quite small less than 10-minutes, you can create a false "average" bit rate by padding the end of your video with "black". These black minutes will have a low data rate and thus push down the overall average for your video.Then encode your own Flash file at a higher bit-rate than YouTube default and then upload your video.Basically going in under the Youtube radar!" Most excellent! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DGusset Posted January 17, 2009 Share Posted January 17, 2009 Thank you for that Karel, That's interesting - and useful .... :) and I will look more closely at your comparisons... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Laurent Andrieux Posted January 18, 2009 Premium Member Share Posted January 18, 2009 Interesting. Can you give a reference or source ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karel Bata Posted January 18, 2009 Author Share Posted January 18, 2009 A post from an editor on another forum. Needs verification of course, but he's pretty reliable. It might be a loophole YouTube will close if it gets used too often. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karel Bata Posted January 23, 2009 Author Share Posted January 23, 2009 (edited) And for those of you struggling to get your YouTube HD and HQ videos embedded on your web pages (currently YouTube only supplies the LQ coding which you then have to tweak) here's a page that does all the hard work for you, whilst also allowing you to test the link: YouTube HD & HQ Embed Code Generator Edited January 23, 2009 by Karel Bata Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karel Bata Posted January 23, 2009 Author Share Posted January 23, 2009 Well, here's a new discovery! If you put up an HD video then an HQ is also available. Here's an HD video to try it out for yourself if you don't have one handy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBS2BRIcYk4 The one at bottom of my coding page appears to be HQ. What that means is that you can put a HD video up on YT and provide the end user with a choice depends on their connection. Or did everyone else already know that..? :( ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now