Mike Brennan Posted December 28, 2004 Share Posted December 28, 2004 Anyone using a downconverted signal to monitor waveform? (as an aid to exposure) Has it worked? Mike Brennan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member John Mastrogiacomo Posted December 28, 2004 Premium Member Share Posted December 28, 2004 Anyone using a downconverted signal to monitor waveform? (as an aid to exposure) Has it worked? Mike Brennan <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I did it once with an F900 shooting 60i into a Textronix WFM90. I just used the luminance. It was O.K. for checking levels because I checked the level of the color bars with it. It just looked a little funky though - like it was coming from a non timebased source. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Elhanan Matos Posted December 29, 2004 Premium Member Share Posted December 29, 2004 Why do you need to downconvert your signal to view it on a waveform monitor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member John Mastrogiacomo Posted December 29, 2004 Premium Member Share Posted December 29, 2004 Why do you need to downconvert your signal to view it on a waveform monitor? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I just took the Y component out of the back of the monitor loop thru. Now that I think of it, I guess there was no downcoversion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Laurent Andrieux Posted December 29, 2004 Premium Member Share Posted December 29, 2004 Is not SDI to components a "down conversion" ? I consider it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member John Mastrogiacomo Posted December 29, 2004 Premium Member Share Posted December 29, 2004 Is not SDI to components a "down conversion" ? I consider it is. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I believe the F900 has hi def component outputs. I consider a down conversion something like hi def to std def. I don't think SDI hi def to component hi def is a down conversion although it does degrade the picture slightly. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Brennan Posted December 29, 2004 Author Share Posted December 29, 2004 I believe the F900 has hi def component outputs. I consider a down conversion something like hi def to std def. I don't think SDI hi def to component hi def is a down conversion although it does degrade the picture slightly. :) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Let me rephrase the question, TO SAVE MONEY have I got your attention:) is anyone regularly using a downconverted HDSDI signal ie SDI (not HDSDI) into a cheap SDI waveform? Saves renting buying an expensive HDSDI waveform. For use for monitoring exposure only, no vector scope use. Mike Brennan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Elhanan Matos Posted December 29, 2004 Premium Member Share Posted December 29, 2004 I have never tried it. But it should work, I don't see any reason why it wouldn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Brennan Posted January 5, 2005 Author Share Posted January 5, 2005 I have never tried it. But it should work, I don't see any reason why it wouldn't. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes it does work! I'm asking if anyone is using it as a regular means of evaluating exposure and if so are there any traps. Mike Brennan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now