Reuel Gomez Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 I know I'm probably alone, but I actually prefer this film to the first one. I just thought when someone like Dave's father died, you actually felt bad for him. As opposed to Big Daddy's death where I felt it was very cheesy. This was lensed by Tim Maurice-Jones and used Arri Alexa Studio/Plus cameras with Zeiss Master Primes, Angenieux Optimo lightweight zooms, and Fujinon Alura studio zooms. There are some slo-mo shots but I don't know what they used for that. Surprisingly, not only did Henry Jackman return as a composer, but Asa Shoul from Molinare returns as colorist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernie Zahn Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 I was looking forward to seeing this but I've read some mixed reviews. I don't usually read reviews but I was compelled to when I heard Jim Carrey refused to do any publicity for it. I mostly enjoyed the first one but I had an issue with how humiliating and trivialized violence was portrayed. I'd be lying if I said I'm against violence in films. That being said, I take issue with the role it plays in films more than the volume of violence featured. I might catch it on Netflix so as to not "knock it before I try it," but I'm not eager to spend $$ to see it in theaters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philip Kral Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 I agree with Reuel, I felt it was better then the first. I also felt it took a more "serious" view on things sometimes (Especially the fathers death), probably because the plot focused on the "coming of age" and of personal responsibilities. I don't know why Carrey refused to do any publicities, I think it's one of his best roles- some people don't even recognize him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reuel Gomez Posted August 18, 2013 Author Share Posted August 18, 2013 I agree with Reuel, I felt it was better then the first. I also felt it took a more "serious" view on things sometimes (Especially the fathers death), probably because the plot focused on the "coming of age" and of personal responsibilities. I don't know why Carrey refused to do any publicities, I think it's one of his best roles- some people don't even recognize him. Couldn't have said it better on both counts, especially regarding Carrey. I honestly think this is his best performance so far period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darryl Shaun Palapuz Posted November 8, 2013 Share Posted November 8, 2013 (edited) I went to see it in theatre, normally I would usually wait til it comes out on BluRay to watch it, but my colleagues offered a ticket for free so I couldn't say no. I honestly thought this was way better than the previous one, the characters developed much more in this movie making it much better in context. I am also in shock because I didn't know it was Jim Carrey until I've seen the credits. Hands down one of his best performances. Come to think of it, I'm glad I didn't know it was him at first because I can never picture him being all that serious in a movie. I gotta hand it to the makers of the movie for not taking this movie way too seriously. I mean that in a good way. Edited November 8, 2013 by Darryl Shaun Palapuz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now