Guest FilmmakerJack Posted May 30, 2005 Share Posted May 30, 2005 Hey, I've been reading around to see what kind of effect I'd want to use for a few short films I'm planning on filming this summer. I am still very new to 16mm and I was wondering if it would be better if instead of using any effects done in processing such as skip bleach, or push-pull, if I did everything in post, since I would be able to do it myself and see the results on hand on FCP. Any word of advice? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member David Mullen ASC Posted May 30, 2005 Premium Member Share Posted May 30, 2005 It might be better if you were specific as to the type of look you wanted; some are easier or better if done in-camera, or in processing, or in digital post. For other looks, all approaches may be about the same in terms of ease or effectiveness. A simple test would be to take a piece of film transferred to video, or video footage, and see what you can do with it in FCP and still get technically acceptable results, plus discover what the rendering times are like, etc. Take that one shot and try everything on it and see what happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raffinator Posted May 31, 2005 Share Posted May 31, 2005 If you are finishing on film, then you would want those effects to take place in camera or at the lab. Sounds like you are going straight to telecine, though, in which case it might be more cost effective to do processing like effects (skip bleach look, for example) in FCP. A company called Digital Film Tools offers a suite of plug ins for FCP that mimic a lot of camera filters and lab processing effects. I haven't worked with them before but I think you can download a demo version (with watermark, of course). Their website: http://www.digitalfilmtools.com/index.htm The 55mm series of filters is the one that includes the camera filters (pro-mist, etc) and trendy processing effects (skip bleach). If anyone has worked with them before, I'd love to know whether they liked the results. Raffi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member John Pytlak RIP Posted June 1, 2005 Premium Member Share Posted June 1, 2005 I agree that if your release format is video, the many tools available in the digital realm can usually mimic the "look" of special photochemical processes. But if your release format is 35mm prints, it may be more cost effective to manipulate the image photographically, than making a digital intermediate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now