Ben Recinos Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Hi everyone, I'm helping with my friend's project for a cinematography class. We'll be using an arri S. Unfortunately he got 500t film and we will be shooting in daylight with an 85 filter. I wanted to ask if anyone here had any suggestions for our shoot, and my friend is concerned about what the f-stop should be set at with such conditions. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Satsuki Murashige Posted April 18, 2016 Premium Member Share Posted April 18, 2016 Your friend should rent or borrow a set of ND filters for the shoot. If that's not possible, then try to shoot in the shade. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member David Mullen ASC Posted April 18, 2016 Premium Member Share Posted April 18, 2016 The Sunny 16 rule in photography says that the exposure in direct frontal sun on a clear day is an f/16 when the ASA is the same number as the shutter speed number under the 1/---. And since at 24 fps with a 180 degree shutter, you get 1/48th of a second, which can be rounded to 1/50th, it means that the exposure for 50 ASA film is f/16. 500T stock with an 85 filter is 320 ASA, so you'd need an 85ND9 combo filter to get down to 40 ASA, in order to shoot between an f/11 and f/16 in direct sunlight. Of course, in backlight you can open up and in the shade as well, but to give yourself any flexibility to go out into full sunlight, you need ND filters to go with your 85, or 85ND combo filters. Or get some 50 ASA film. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ari Michael Leeds Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 I don't know if this was advertent or not, but Satsuki, that is one of the most hilarious suggestions I've seen! "Try to shoot in the shade." LOL!Yeah, this is the whole reason they make such slow film for cinematography: Need the low speed for daylight exteriors. Amazing digital STILL has not addressed this, as filters compromise image quality and sharpness. Built in ND is OK, but what if you need another one on top of that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Satsuki Murashige Posted April 18, 2016 Premium Member Share Posted April 18, 2016 Why hilarious? If the guy is shooting day exteriors with effectively 320ASA film and doesn't have NDs, what else can he do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Gladstone Posted April 19, 2016 Share Posted April 19, 2016 (edited) Overcranking? You'd eat through your film a lot quicker, but you would get some nice slow motion shots out of it. (I'm not saying this is a good idea, but it is an option.) Also, you could intentionally overexpose a stop and pull process the film. Your lens may also stop down smaller than f/16. Edited April 19, 2016 by Josh Gladstone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member David Mullen ASC Posted April 19, 2016 Premium Member Share Posted April 19, 2016 Or close down the shutter angle but that's not possible with an Arri-S, but then, you can't overcrank one much either. If a filmmaker can't figure out how to get ahold of an ND filter, he or she isn't being very resourceful -- you could just buy a still camera lens ND filter at a camera store and probably tape it on. But even better would be to borrow one. If that's not possible then find a heavily shaded location like a park with a lot of trees and shoot in backlight... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Recinos Posted April 20, 2016 Author Share Posted April 20, 2016 Hey everyone, Thank you all for some great advice. We will be using a 85 and a nd9 filter together to bring it down to 40 asa like what David Mullen suggested. It'll be 2 filters attached, I don't know if we have a single filter that does both. I'm excited for the shoot, and will be happy to post the results of the film up here when it's completed. We will be shooting this Friday, so in about 2 weeks should be good. -Ben Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ari Michael Leeds Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 Imagine a movie where they shot everythign in the shade, not for stylistic, or script-serving reasons (and, I could've SWORN you were harping, really really really hard on serving the story on me recently, Satsuki), but because they couldn't get ND filters!B)And man, lighten up. You take it personal even when it isn't. If you've got a camera and you can't budget for an ND, it's a whole different set of playig rules. The joke's on him, not on you, whatever your definitions of photography or cinematography are. Hell, steal some opaque plastic from a construction sight if you're that desperate. B) CVS sunglasses anyone? 4.99? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Satsuki Murashige Posted April 20, 2016 Premium Member Share Posted April 20, 2016 Pretty sure it's just a cinematography class exercise, not a whole film. Remember those? I do. We'd take a Bolex, Arri S, or Scoopic out, set up a few shots and shoot a 100' roll. Ain't no script or story, just a few purty shots. Anyway, he's got NDs, so the point is moot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ari Michael Leeds Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 It's in film stocks and processing, not student, so that's not immediately clear, though I guess I may have missed something earlier. Never had the luxury of film school, though I get asked where I went to one all the time. A lot of what I learned was from generous, outgoing, knowlegeable people like Dave Mullen.And you're still making this a contest; it's not. I was agreeing with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now