Nikolas Moldenhauer Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 Hello filmmakers, I startet a discussion in "Anamorphic Shooters" on FB on this topic, but we couldn't come up with a definitive answer… some said I might have better luck here especially with input from @David Mullen that has very good Panavision insights. When the golden area Bond movies started using anamorphic lenses with "Thunderball" and "You Only Live Twice" the anamorphic characteristics are very much muted. Of course, it was the fashion of the time to work with high f-stops to make the lenses "bite" and get deeper DoF… flares where mostly considered a flaw and where avoided when possible. All that is possible given enough light when using the 100 iso film stock of that time. But then, there are scenes like the attached image shows. Considering the low sensitivity and that it is impossible to light the street all the way that must have been shot relatively wide open… why the hell do the distant lights don't fall off into oval shapes?!? It is definitely an anamorphic lens used here as the (very muted) flare proofs. That seems to be true for all shot… elongated highlights are rare and very muted. The Panavision C that where supposedly used for "You Only Live Twice" (even though they where introduced a year after the movies release?!?!) have quite expressive anamorphic features. Blade Runner was shot on them too… (in an updated, altered version of course) If you will… please enlighten me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member David Mullen ASC Posted October 2, 2020 Premium Member Share Posted October 2, 2020 You’d have to pick a frame where the focus distance was much closer, in a wide shot with the focus set in the distance you wouldn’t get enough out of focus shapes to judge bokeh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikolas Moldenhauer Posted October 2, 2020 Author Share Posted October 2, 2020 Thanks for your input… more samples attached. The elongation is there of course… just not as much as I would expect. Even in scenes that would have been had to be shot reasonably open. Why so muted.' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member David Mullen ASC Posted October 2, 2020 Premium Member Share Posted October 2, 2020 Well, it’s muted because again, these are medium shots on medium to wide focal lengths— movies back then didn’t shoot as tight on every scene. Find a chest-up CU with lights in the distant. Also with slow film stock, night lights are not going to show up as dramatically — I think that’s an issue here. But just looking at these shots, the anamorphic bokeh seems typical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikolas Moldenhauer Posted October 2, 2020 Author Share Posted October 2, 2020 They seem to just avoid that by all means ? So nothing out of the ordinary there… high f-stop, flat composition, wide lenses, avoiding shooting into lights… basically just shooting style Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikolas Moldenhauer Posted October 2, 2020 Author Share Posted October 2, 2020 This shot from "La La Land" is somewhat comparable in focus distance to the "Bond in the street scene" Distant lights are very elongated while Bonds are really not… thats what I was wondering about Lenses should be C-Series in both Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member David Mullen ASC Posted October 2, 2020 Premium Member Share Posted October 2, 2020 I don't see much difference. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member David Mullen ASC Posted October 2, 2020 Premium Member Share Posted October 2, 2020 I think between Freddie Young probably working a stop down and using slow film stock so the lights don't record as much, you're not seeing the amount of bokeh that a modern movie would have using faster film and shooting wider-open. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikolas Moldenhauer Posted October 3, 2020 Author Share Posted October 3, 2020 Thanks a lot for your input David... you are very kind and helpful!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now