Jump to content

Jon-Hebert Barto

Basic Member
  • Posts

    346
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jon-Hebert Barto

  1. OK. My friend is telling me that the bad guys are the production companies who pay to have the films made and this "boss syndicate" which he tells me is the government, no? So these companies are getting in bed with the government to pass a new bill basically saying that if you are an artist and can't get work in your such-n-such field then we are not going to pay you as the need does not meet with the expectation. So if there is no film work for you then you do not get money. If there is film work for you then you get a job and get paid. Right?

     

    My question is: If these companies didn't have to pay into this fund wouldn't they put this money into other productions so there would be more work?

  2. jm delorme quote- "We used to have a collective fund for film workers. and it was a good protection against unumployment.

    This fund was the adition of each worker contribution so those who work will save some money to protect those who aren't working and so one."

     

     

     

    :blink: Wait a minute....! Are you saying that if I'm a DOP in france and can't get work then, well, the people who do get work pay into a fund from which I can support myself? Whoa!!! Ummm...

    I'm going to have to get a drink. I'll be right back... :o

     

    Ok. So does this pay better than your normal work or what? Can't you get another job(one outside of the film business) to pay the bills during "down time" ? I don't think I'm understanding this correctly, I can't be. I know in the USA there are programs that help old actors and retired film professionals get medical care and stuff like that (paid into by current stars and whatnot) but I've never heard of anything like this. At least in the states.

     

    Does this have to do with unions ? Why march against the government? If they pay you guys not to work then, WOW! Is France a socialist state? I think it is. Most Euro countries are these days, no? I'm kind of ignorant about this stuff so no offense meant. But could someone else explain this to me...? Please? Shouldn't france be putting money into other things like the health care system? I know ours sucks to high heaven but didn't like, 5,000 people die in a heat wave a year or two ago in france? Buy some AC for all those old folks...rebuild those burnt down cities and towns. I love art and those trying to keep artist from starving but....WOW....WOW Please educate me, as I think I need it. Thanks-Jonnie

  3. WOOOW WOOOOW

     

    Rule Number 1.....do not criticise the fincher ok. Do NEVER criticise camera movements through a 3D animated environment :)

     

    It's ok, dude. Who doesn't like mastubatory cinema..?! That was a shot, just in case you didn't get it. All in fun , though :lol:

     

    First of all I confused 'Panic Room' with 'Fight Club'. I was talking about the shots where the cameras floated through the house.

     

    Hey, Audiris-

    You forgot the shot in Panic Room where the camera goes through the stair banister...! You were not wrong on the Panic Room critique after all. Just the wrong shot.. :D

     

    I don't think anyone here hates the "Fincher". We just have fun.

  4. I think Malick is one of the greatest living American film makers today. Great movie all around. In fact, better than those "osacr favorite" pictures. Whatever the highs and lows of this picture, we can all agree that it is top tier material. We are watching an inspired artist at work.

     

    Malick is a very interresting figure. His favorite philosopher is Heidegger (?) as is mine, although I can't remember how to spell his name. He actually translated some of his work back in the '70s. Reading works like Being and Time , I feel, gives some insight to Malicks film theory as well as world view through his films.

     

    Oh, yeah....The only bad thing about The New World is colin farrel. I really don't think this guy can act. That is to say I feel he just projects suppossed feelings and emotions....? I can't put my finger on it. I've seen some good work of his, Tiger Land, Minority Report, etc., but he is not some great actor that should be working with the talents of Malick!!! (in my humble opinion...) I would go so far to say that Tom Cruise is a better actor!!! Thats right, I said it. Maybe it's just a personal problem....I thought I would be able to get through it like I got through Gere in Heavens Gate. It just didn't happen for me.

  5. Ok. I checked the forums archive first and lots of info on the 2-perf subjuct, but nothing on the telecine process for this... :( Where can it be done...? Will some places do it if I send them a gate. I'm not interested in projection, just telecine to digital format tape. This old techniscope trick sounds perfect for me if only I knew of a solid place that would do the transfer for me. Any in the US? I found one place in Australia, but....that is a long way to go... ;)

     

    Thanks for your time, Jonnie

  6. Ok. I checked the forums archive first and lots of info on the 2-perf subjuct, but nothing on the telecine process for this... :( Where can it be done...? Will some places do it if I send them a gate. I'm not interested in projection, just telecine to digital format tape. This old techniscope trick sounds perfect for me if only I knew of a solid place that would do the transfer for me. Any in the US? I found one place in Australia, but....that is a long way to go... ;)

     

    Thanks for your time, Jonnie

  7. My father used to shoot Marxist Chinese propaganga, and I was shocked to see Farenheit 9/11 packed with the most basic techniques of Eisenstein and Griffith.

     

    Being a Marxist for 25 years, I developed quite an appreciation for Soviet cinema. Tarkovsky is probably the best of the non-propaganda auters. Eisenstein was the best Marxist propagandist, while, all the way over in the U.S, D.W Griffith did a hell of a job for the anti-black, anti-semitic Klansmen propaganda with Birth of a Nation.

     

    Propaganda probably alienates people, so i'll knock that off, but, short of going to Yale University, I have yet to see a good Propaganda course taught. I mention the science of propaganda because it is practically inseperable from Soviet film.

     

    I have to say that Зеркало is perhaps superior to Солярис, simply on the level of editing and cinematography.

     

    I am going to buy a 35mm print of Solaris as soon as I can find one

     

    Leni Riefenstahl. Best ever. Triumph des willens still astounds technically.

  8. I don't like films about film production, however this film rocks! Robert Yeoman did great work, as usual. To respond to most of the posters: What exactly is "feature material"? Isn't the medium of film big enough for everything...? I hate action films but I'm glad they are around...because film isn't just an artistic venue. It is also an entertainment venue. Love Tarkovsky, hate Bay. Still glad they both made movies.

  9. Go to Texas. I knew A LOT of grads and under grads there. All of them were idiots. ;) Oh, yeah...they have that whole "third coast" thing going there as well. You could either stand out among the rest or join the dogmatic sheep. Wherever you go, go to learn the technical aspects of film making and for god sake learn film history. Just don't let the teachers push you into stuff. Sometimes taking a film course is like taking a Poly-Sci course in the way (some) prof's have a dogmatic view philisophically. I don't think it really matters where you go as long as it offers good tech courses. Remeber that line in "Good Will Hunting". The one about learning as much for $1.50 in late fees at the library...? :D

  10. Thanks...I just bought that book online for $120 !!! Hope I don't get shafted on the film strip...from private seller. The new FULL METAL JACKET book is cool, too. Great behind the scenes photos, fast read. Nothing tech. Modine did well, however.

  11. Different stories require different aspect ratios. And every person will see the same story in a differing way. Kubrick used academy AND he shot 60mm 2.40 (or whatever 2001 was...) he used just about every damn aspect ratio and you wont find one person on this site that can respect themselves if they said, for example, " Barry Lyndon would be better at 2.35." If someone is having trouble figuring out what aspect ratio to use on a project, especially pet projects, then they dont have command of the story in their minds eye. They don't yet "see" it for what it's worth to them. Just my two cents...

     

    As for the space movie, I'm only twelve but widescreen in space kicks butt!

  12. Hi, All! New to the forum. Love reading all the threads, just full of usefull info.

     

    Now to my querry,...Is it possible to mount a variable shutter onto the Konvas 2M. Perhaps a VS from a Eclair CM3? Any help would be much abliged!!! Thanks.

×
×
  • Create New...