Emanuel A Guedes

0.1.6 version release We already knew the quality audio feature, now rack focus in-camera among many other features: * Custom cropmarks bitmap file * Live histogram while recording * Time remaining estimate indicator * Automated focus pulls * Focus stacking * HDR exposure bracketing * Lens data (hyperfocal distance, DOF, etc) * Cleaner, multi-level menus that timeout automatically * Audio monitoring can be turned off during clip review * Internal mic can be used (must enable audio.mic-power=1 in config) * Output audio volume control * Configuration can be saved into magiclantern.cfg LINK for details On other forums: http://www.cinema5d.com/viewtopic.php?f=56&t=4589 http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?t=180272 And here's a link where the feature development has been presented with the help of other contributions (interesting ones*, actually): Rack focus using EF motors via Software * with the release of more power to come

Mike (Thorn) has added some updated information on the subject-matter (#7).

Criminal or Penal Law as it is known in countries of roman-german root aka Continental Law (vs. Common Law) have very strictly defined principles of scope. If it is true that ignorance of the law doesn't necessarily mean excuse, only a crime (or a violation sanctioned like that) might lead someone to such punishment. It is more accurate to handle the topic with another relaxed approach once what might expect you would be nothing else than a fine, on the edge.

OK, they're old news (Anders added some useful information): http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=7073 Here's a second route, same way anyways: http://www.reduser.net/forum/showpost.php?...mp;postcount=10 Hope this helps.

Why not? It does seem odd and, at first glance, more disinformation than everything else.

Obscenities apart (after all, why are they necessary beyond their frivolity?), the opinions are like the holes, everyone has more than one (I didn't write just one :-). I can even try to understand your reasons seeing mine above-posted as much more marketing crap than everything else. But let's speak with facts. I am just who is paying my bills as RED customer. Nothing else. I am not a markeeter nor RED employee. What I've seen is that there's too much attention from the part of this company in certain goals. Not mine -- and here I can speak on behalf of a lot of other RED customers. I am in touch with them every day. And I'm not referring the reduser.net fanboys for sure. ;) What is important to this people is not the technical hype that the usual geeks or others like to make notice or pursue. OK, maybe we are more under the POV of a producer, director or many other crafts beyond the cinematographers. Cinematography is just one among them. To each is own. Every cinematographers that I know are paid by the producer(s) with the money that some other anonymous people at the office are signing below. Do not underestimate this. Light production tools is what the majority of the market is looking for, not the 'Ferraris'. My humble two cents.

Maybe hundreds but even dozens is enough. The idea is there anyway. This is what this revolution means. It is not the high tech to make history but a change of the actual structures. Any historian can confirm it.

Is this a 'big excitement' today or whenever? Don't think so. With the due respect for anyone else, the (greatest) most part of shooters don't need to know the opinion of this or that one in any way other than as another one to add to the pile (positive or negative parts). Moreover, I can figure out that Jim J. is too much committed to comply some milestones. To him, it is the same as Ferrari was to Enzo. I never drove such car, I don't need nor have any interest in such program. To me and a lot of indies out there, as far as possible from the mainstream agenda, the better. * In the real world, among the RED clientele, it is a common place to admit that Scarlet is what Epic will never be (a way more important than the latter). For each Epic sold, RED will make thousands of Scarlet sales. The usual loyal RED basis. This is what counts in the end. Do not forget the content is king. Give us the minimal tools for getting it. Got the standard, that's such an achievement, should be the only goal. Not counterproductive and fallacious massages (from outside) to any ego, please. * It is what we customers can best wish to this project (the centre of any revolution?)

I think Stephen is referring this: http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/prod...tal-25-of-2009/ As matter of fact, they're news of two days ago. Only reported today at reduser.

You can try to open a thread here instead. With luck, she will still read today.

Once you probably don't speak my native language, it should be your interlocutor to write in yours -- I stand corrected: «to a clever reader that I am sure you are» or «to a clever read that I am sure you did» Similar idea, anyway. I hope. ;)

Keith, Since I've noticed you have a successive triple post since this morning in Europe -- before that there will be another thread closed once again, I'm afraid you are in risk to become to speak alone to yourself one day. It wouldn't be pleasant to see. Who do you exactly miss? This portuguese here? Because since we are a way more than 10,000,000 allover the world, it is just a feeling that it is an uncalled-for engaging this 'person' here. Or do you miss anyone from the infamous filmmaker's gang joke by any chance? 'cause whenever someone makes mention of 'James/Jim Murdoch' character you don't forget to attack the usual RED supporters at cinematography.com from day one (prepare yourself Tom ;-) not even forgetting Jan's real name now. Do not enroll me in your past mess, OK? Would it work if I'd ask you with a formal please? Sigh. :lol: I thought 'the über-variable English skills' could add something more in behalf of the real world to a clever read that I am sure you are, despite your usual not beautiful hate(s) over this RED sub-forum. By the way, once you've finally decided to add your own picture to your avatar, why don't you join us at reduser.net where I have mine? E.

I second the plead. I have my partners asking me the same every day.

Paolo Tinari. He's in Prague nowadays even though for personal reasons. I'm not sure when he'll be back to Rome. He's one of the most coolest guys you can find out whether in these boards whether as your help in real life on any RED issue related to. I am sure he will give you a hand. I surely have his contact but it wouldn't be polite to pass you as obvious once he's based in Italy. You can find him @ reduser.net though. Hope this helps. Good luck!

On the abject thing, well seen. A picture to describe it better? It would be difficult to get it. :-)

On your presumption (but you could get a second colour or are you prepping your application for a tabloid?), bigbrother, you couldn't be more wrong. She's having now her fair sleep at home (lisbon time zone, you know). Husband's working. Moreover, she has no clue about who you are either. I'm not used to tell her about you. In a collective (last time I checked, the cinema is a collective work but maybe there may have differences between people used to live together two months or 2 days...), there are different minds. Taking the prior example, if we just add a blank (it's not necessary more than that) in between: « (...) Jan would probably say you shouldn't waste your precious time going after your precious (?) screenplays directly to the screen, if it wouldn't be a computer screen. It certain lacks the DVD or the Blu-ray player. We didn't write BD recorder but you can take it as granted. (...) » It will offer another reading, can't you get it? As for instance, Stephen's post has a meaning, you've added it a different one with yours. I am quite sure the original one was quite different from the latter one. Same for our distinct opinions about him or you. You are mentioned only as mere example. No more than this. ;) You should be grateful you have your fanboys among them. Don't mistreat your audiences. I know they don't pay ticket but...

From the gang (Stephen's love), in a Emanuel's rest moment: Jan would probably say you shouldn't waste your precious time going after your precious (?) screenplays directly to the screen, if it wouldn't be a computer screen. It certain lacks the DVD or the Blu-ray player. We didn't write BD recorder but you can take it as granted. :lol: We call it brainstorming if any reader here will be aware of it.

I can even figure out your reasonable POV on the hyperbole argument. But you should quote me first before taking as granted that every RED customers or users eat from the same menu.

Shot on 4K RED ONE S35mm sensor size. 2K (Workflow). Exhibition's print, 35mm film. Kodak, I believe. (lab) Tobis [ LINK ] in Lisbon.

As far as the first part concerns, I just can say it is well seen. I'm just trying to refrain (at least I hope) their jokes over here for respect towards Stephen, David or even Tim Tyler. But for your own sake, I can assure to you they are all shooting nowadays, not sailing through daily web. On your second part, it's just your original humor which you're already used to show off to everybody that comes to read these boards. Not fake copies. I'm sure (we know) there are a lot of people who come, read, disagree with your RED bashing. But 'cause these other posters feel threatened to be insulted when they express themselves their opinions freely only why they say what they think about RED, they are not posting their own impressions or experience among you so often as they could do. A few of you seem to me a bunch of guys in certain regions of Europe during the '30s. Yet about facts, here's another one: I've just watched, last night [ LINK ], a short [ LINK 2 ] made by a former student not from the traditional official filmschool but outside [ LINK 3 ]. Never in Portugal, a northern student could have the opportunity to shoot in 35mm till now without to go to the big town as I did myself in order to conclude my four-years BFA in Directing and Editing before dreaming with a 35mm camera. Yesterday night, a short 35mm shot was 1st part of a multi academy awarded digital shot feature (Slumdog...) where there was another preview, RED shot (Che). Is it allowed to me to post my impressions on it without being attacked just 'cause I have facts over some usual hate from one or two posters who are always trying to denigrate RED and its customers or shooters, trying to re-write the truth as it could be possible to argue against just evidences? In a single line, RED ONE footage (@ the big screen) is beyond my initial expectations. Same for the people with me yesterday night. All graduated by Lisbon_Film_School (including from the cinematography department). The best I could check. So far. :-) PS [EDIT] You asked it, you've got it.

I could check this your provocation only today. What's your problem? Didn't your mother teach you to respect the others? Or at least their opinions?

Your POV, Tim, is from a professional, I believe. Used to a different sales approach, as we all know. Jim has to deal with his visionary dream and target offering his products to a vast group of potential customers. As RED customer, I must say I like to know that he's reaching his policy and goal, getting success with the economies of scale strategy in order to keep the prices down. Same with Jan, I think.

Stephen, Where have you found this information? E. :-) EDIT -- Editing the quote.

Jan, You've forgot the Canon 5D Mark II. ;) Emanuel :-)

Valuable helpful post, thanks for posting. As matter of fact, highjacking your 'pas de deux' (talk) or climbing the horse too, it should be useful to listen you about those 24p conversion tests there: What do you think about them beyond the fact it should be better to shoot 24p native (but that camera doesn't offer other than 30p mode) ?