Jump to content

Maty Grosman

Basic Member
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Occupation
    Other
  1. Hey Everyone, I posted this topic earlier in the HD section, but thought that this might be a more appropriate place. I have a lot of HDV footage that I'd like to start reviewing and making log notes; however, I can't seem to find any digital media playing application with the capability of playing it back while displaying the original SMPTE timecode... (no such problem with DV footage) Making DVD's with timecode burn is going to be very time consuming, and I thought that there must be a simpler option out there... Any input will be much appreciated, thanks!
  2. Hey Everyone, I'm looking for a player that can play HDV footage while displaying the original SMPTE time code. Any help in the matter will be much appreciated, thanks!
  3. By "uprezzing" and "line doubling", do you mean increasing the resolution by duplicating existing pixels? If so, how would I do that? (I'm a bit out of my tree here; so if I'm way off, could you please explain the concepts?) Also, if I were to go with uprezzing the SD, how significantly noticeable a difference would there be between the upgraded SD footage and the genuine HD? Thanks again!
  4. Hi everyone, I have some footage shot for a documentary that, due to conditions, varies between HD & SD. Can I reconcile the two standards to be used in a single project? I imagine it is possible to degrade the HD footage to SD, but is there any method by which I could upgrade the SD footage to HD? (Seems like a long shot, but I thought I might ask...) Any advice would be greatyl appreciated, Thanks!
  5. Thanks for the reply, David. The link was very helpful. I've done a bit of browsing on the subject, and it seems that the method for clibrating a TV set is the same.
  6. Hey everyone, I've just joined an independent 'no-budget' production as a PA; most crew members (including myself) have little or no experience, so it's mostly 'learn as you go'. The first shooting day raised quite a few questions in my head, and I was hoping to find some answers here. My main concern was when the Gaffer and DP were trying to set up the lighting; the image on the camera monitor (a digital consumer camera) and on the field monitor (just a regular TV set they were using) differed greatly in brightness and in contrast. The solution they came up with was to adjust the monitor's settings to resemble those of the camera monitor; however, it just did not seem right to me--camera monitors just seem to be of very high contrast and even differ from one camera to the other, and besides, I thought that the whole idea of using a monitor was to see the image as it should be, rather than as it appears through the camera monitor. I therefore thought that there must be some 'standard' or 'default' monitor settings that would be a sort of consensus amongst all monitors and TV sets. This seems to make sense, for otherwise the same footage would appear different from set to set, and one would be unable to communicate the image as he wants it to appear. Well, that's as far as my commonsense goes... I would appreciate if anyone could let me know if there are any flaws in this reasoning, and, if there is a standard, where could I find more information about it. Thanks Maty
  7. Hey, Sorry for the delayed response, I didn't have a chance to check in lately. I thank everyone for taking the time to post their views in my absance, it is greatly appreciated. I decided against film school for the time being, but trying to work my way in--and up. Thanks again. Maty.
  8. Hi, I'm not sure whether this is an appropriate place to post my question, but I failed to find a more appropriate one yet... My aspiration, in the long run, is to be writing and directing for film. I believe that in order to do so properly I need to acquire a strong base and understanding of all the technical elements involved in the process of production, from camera operation, to lighting, to editing, etc. Ultimately, I believe the best way to learn would have been joining an able crew, and learning from people who do what they do best. But that seems quite impossible to me; unfortunately, with all my good intention and abilities, I doubt anyone would take a person with no experience or background in the field under his wing. So I started looking into film schools. My first problem lays with the courses. As I said, the reason I consider attending a film school is to have access to equipment and technical knowledge which I would otherwise not be able to acquire by myself--whereas courses such as film history, creative writing etc. (although I?m sure they can be very interesting) I will be able to learn on my own, and for a fraction of the cost. (That is to say nothing about elective courses, which have nothing to do with the industry) My second problem (or rather question) is regarding the broadness and intensity of the knowledge I would actually acquire. I have in my area (Toronto, Canada) a few alternatives to choose from, mainly, a four-year program at Ryerson University costing approx. $26,000, and an intensive (according to advertisement) 15-month program at the Toronto Film School, for the same sum. Each and every institution promises to bring their graduates to an "industry-level" upon graduation, yet I cannot help but feel skeptical about such a statement. Moreover, upon doing some research to find out what people who had previously attended film schools could actually say in their behalf, the most recurring statement was that they "met a lot of people and made voluble connections" (or something along these lines). This is NOT the reason for which I plan to attend an educational institution, to say the least... As to the content of these programs, all I could find were short and somewhat vague descriptions, which merely left me even more puzzled then before. At the bottom line, what I am getting at is that $26,000 is A VERY big monetary investment for me to make, and I cannot find any means of ascertaining whether it be justified by what I will end up receiving in return. I'm afraid I might find myself a year (or four) from now, fresh out of school, and with nothing to show for it except for some graduation paper, a list of contacts, and a $26,000 loan hanging over my shoulders. Lastly, there is the option of investing some of this money towards a decent HDV camera and a few good books, and slowly learn on my own. Yet, as much as I tend to favor this approach, it has its own drawbacks; mainly where I started from, that with a camcorder and a few books I can only do so much, while there is so much technical equipment and knowledge which I fail to see a way of obtaining or attaining on my own. Even more importantly, I would have nothing to do with film, and I don't think I'll be able to learn and build high theoretical constructs without feeling it with my own hands... Well, this is pretty much my dilemma spread-out on paper. I hoped that people who are actually working in the industry might have some useful insights, which may lead me to a fresh perspective on the subject. I thank anyone who have read this far, and would greatly appreciate any comments or advices you may share. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...