I saw Collateral the other night and I have to say it was a pretty weak movie. The cinematogrphy was perfectly fine to me but the story could have used some work. It wasnt the fact that the movie was shot on video that bothered me, it was the fact that they had choosen to shoot it on video. I felt as if the people who put together this film? video?, came in expecting it to be as weak as it was. If people go the the theater to pay the ridiculous prices to see a weak movie I think the film makers should have the decency to shoot it on film. I feel that with the birth of the video age film makers are allowing themselves to produce weaker movies while still making enormous profits. DOES anyone agree????
