Hi mister Walter Graff,
Thank you for your so kind reply. Since you are so great and you've "tested both cameras extensively" you should have been the one to writte this post. Share your tests. I'm sure they are more accurate. I've been looking for weeks for tests in the Internet.
I do hope as well that no one looked at my "results" as anything but strachatella and banana split.
I am aware that with all the different factors and settings, we might obtain a similar picture with both cameras, or obtain the opposite results than the ones i got.
But that's exactly the point! There are so many differents possibilities in the settings of each camera, and in the lighting of a scene, that even if you test "both cameras extensively", you won't ever know if there wasn't a better option with one of the camera for a particular scene. That is an exact science but with an infinity of possibilities.
So, in my case, I had to choose a camera to buy. I've been looking in Internet for weeks for as much informations as I could about these cameras. So, now, with the possibilities that I had, I made the tests that I could. And for these particular settings and this particular lighting, these are the "results" that I got.
As for the ISO test. That was the result I obtain with this particular amount of light. And I am aware that is different with another amount of light. And it was interesting for me to see it.
Thank you for inciting me to clarify things up. I would have prefer less condescension though.
Best regards.
Sebastien.