Thanks for the reply Phil. So it seems like I might need to experiment with various densities of theatrical gauze and have some polarizers on hand. It seems like the trial and error of making this work would cost a lot of money, LOL! At least I know I could get a lot of intel from the theater world, so thank you! But I wonder, is there anyone out here who has specifically done this before? Again, let me just clarify the way this portion of the installation works-
Person on one side of screen, camera on the other. The cam is recording the person (this is not an actor actually, just a random person alone in the room visiting the gallery.. it’s an art project). There is a film being projected on the screen, seen from the person’s POV. The camera behind the screen is filming their reaction to the projection. The projection doesn’t show up on camera, only the person. It can’t be that the camera is placed elsewhere in the room, it has to be from behind the screen to get a full on, standard wide shot. Ideally, It’s kind of like a 2-way mirror in a police station that’s also a TV, but the TV images are only viewable from the interrogation side of the room. The onlookers would have a normal clear view of the subject in the interrogation room.
Sorry if this has been confusing... this is only one portion of the project. The final installation is made up of multiple rooms with different complications to be dealt with, but this room seems to be the one lingering on the side of impossibility. But, potentially the answer lies in theatrical gauze.. I’ll look into it.
Thanks again,
Corey