I thought that 8mm regular is basically 16mm wide double perf with more perfs than normal 16mm. I was thinking along the lines of a bolex C8 and B8 which have prime lenses, have control of speed and also have the size of a modern camcorder (ultra compact).
I disagree that 8 is all about keeping it simple. Some people use this as an excuse for not using a tripod and for poor footage and subject choice sometimes too. If it was all about only keeping it simple, thesophisticated Beaulieus 4008 ,Canon XL-S and the like would not be such hot cameras. People would just let the film roll with any camera. My point is that there is concern with the quality too. After all well done super 8 should surpass the resolution and other image properties of a DV camera, or should it not?