Jump to content

Tebbe Schoeningh

Basic Member
  • Posts

    131
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Tebbe Schoeningh

  1. Hi and happy NY all!!!!!

     

    It's been many years since i was posting in the forum

    but i'm glad to be back

     

    here is below what i did so far :

     

    www.jmdelorme.com

     

    let me know what you think about it, mainly comercials

     

    2013 may be the year of long feature and 3D so i let you updated.

     

    take care

     

    welcome back jean-marie! still remember you!

  2. The question is how 2.2K with a Zeiss Ultra 16 compares with whatever else you could use at 2.5K. But since there are not a lot of fast 6mm lenses out there, it might be not much of a contest.

     

    On the other hand, you could just shoot 2.4/1 and the vingetteing will just about disappear.

     

    Cheers.

     

    Once I get my hands on a BMCC I´ll make comparative tests. I´m interested in the Ultra16´s because those are excellent lenses with a really fast aperture and useable wide open.

     

    I don´t know why but I can´t upload any more pictures. Once I can upload again I´ll post the pictures of the missing 6 lenses.

  3. Hi,

     

    today I shot a quick (and dirty) test with a full set of 9 Arri Ultra16 lenses and a Red Scarlet @ 3K.

    The active sensor size of the Scarlet @ 3K is almost the same as the one of the BMCC.

    The Red @ 3K is using 16.65 X 9.36mm of the sensor, the BMCC 15.81 X 8.88mm. This is roughly a difference of 5% in size.

     

    Then I upscaled the stills from the Red by 5% in Photoshop to see how much vignetting would be visible. I´ll attach the results.

    From the 18mm on vignetting is clearly visible. The whole set would be usable by cropping 12-14% which means you would end up with 2.2K - 2.15K of resolution in RAW-Mode.

     

    That´s all for today, what do you think?

     

     

  4. Hi Mark,

     

    CP2´s are FF lenses (only the 18mm isn´t). Using them on a S16 sized sensor you will have difficulties to obtain a wide field of view.

    Another disadvantage of the CP.2 is that their T-stop is not the same for the whole set (T 2.1 - T 3.9 I think) meanwhile the Zeiss SS are all 1.3 (although I wouldn´t recommend to shoot wide open with them).

  5. Thanks Mathew!

    Yeah I would definitely use other lenses too, but we're shooting everything handheld on the wide-side with a tight schedule (surprise) :)

     

    Can't belive how little comparison-info there is on these lenses, you would think somebody on the internet would have compared them by now. Maybe I'll have to do a proper test...

     

    WOuld be great to see some proper test comparing those. Would you share?

     

    Thanks!

  6. I don't understand why someone would produce a 2k cinema camera when all real modern cinema is shot on film and scanned at 4-8k or shot on digital at least 4k but usually 6k.

     

    err...sure?

    - what do you mean by "real modern cinema"

    - usually 35mm is scanned at 4K and if there is a filmout its mostly at 2K

    - Arris Alexa is about 2.8K in most cases downsampled to ProRes HQ at HD resolution, Red Epic is up to 5K but very often used at 2K resolution for high speed work

     

    The point of making this camera is to offer RAW-capture at an inexpensive price.

×
×
  • Create New...