Jump to content

Adamo P Cultraro

Basic Member
  • Posts

    156
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Adamo P Cultraro

  1. Well I suppose the HPX500 is a better narrative cam for the price compared to an HPX2000 - but it's moot to me since the next cam after my HVX will be a RED.

     

    I think that as the price of the panny cams goes up - there really are diminshing returns on the bigger models, especially as a narrative filmmaker. Who the hell is really going to notice the picture on an HPX2000 being radically better than my HVX. I shot the F900 on many projects and I'd say the pic quality of the HVX is 90-95% of the F900s for a fraction of the money.

     

    The only reason I'm buying a RED is the price per value ratio compared to cameras like the HPX2000.

  2. Except for the fact that the HDX900 is an orphan now. You'd be a fool to buy that cam over an HPX500. Same functionality, no tape.

     

    I have an HVX200 - it's a camera that's used interchangeably on the show 4400 with an F900 - you can't really tell. Plus, it has p2 recording capability and variable frame rates - something the HDX900 doesn't have.

     

    The HDX900 seems like a dinosaur now that the HPX500 is out. I'd take an HPX in a heartbeat. I'd never go back to tape....it's dead.

  3. If you want SAG actors your production must be a SAG signatory. I say your production - not your company. Example - you decide to make a short film - that short film must come under a SAG agreement to cover the talent.

     

    Sure, a SAG actor can be naughty and just work for you - it's really his problem not yours - but he faces a host of trouble from SAG.

     

    Actually, my wife is a SAG actress and I use her all the time in my stuff without asking SAG. I figure if I have to check before I film my wife SAG can go piss up a rope. But she could get in trouble, theoretically.

×
×
  • Create New...