---Very true but then we can also give up in terms of exploring new techniques and stick with film. In my opinion it is always good to find new ways of telling a story be it with higher frame rates or more resolution or for that matter 3d. All the major companies like Thompson, Sony, Phillips are busy exploring 3d. Does this mean the image is less organic when shooting 3d digitally than on film? No. It is just another way of telling your story. I would love to see heavy drama in 3d and then judge whether I am emotionaly involved or not. Is that too much of an effect to drag me into the storty or is it just something we have to get used to?
---Helas, I think that "organic" is what you got used to over the years. I think it will always be a matter of taste. But I thought the whole discussion was about what the next step would be. That it will be digital is no surprise to anybody but the real next step? 3d 100 Hz? Have you seen 100 Hz films? because there is a real difference there, no more obturation, no more motionblur and still controlable depth of field, no more headaches. And of course the Americans can go to 120 Hz. There has to be a difference
---Exactly my point.
Maarten
Director
