OK, so I am confused about all the different HD formats... it was so much easier in the SD days when all you had was (basically, digitally) three options.
1- Uncompressed. Best quality and the best option for professionals wanting the best. Overkill for consumers, a bit more tricky to edit.
2- DV compressed. Good quality. Easy to edit. A good option for semipro and for consumers.
3- Mpeg2 compressed. Not as good image quality as DV, a bad option for editing. Mostly a compression for finalizing the work to a DVD.
OK, lets look at HD.
1- Uncompressed 4:4:4. Best quality, huge files. Only for Pros. Hard to edit?
2- ? What is the HD compression comparable to SD-DVcompression?
3- H264. Not as good image quality due to compression, not a good option for editing. The compression to use when finishing on Bluray.
So What do you guys think should be the "DV comparable" compression in HD (number 2 in my list)?
AVCHD? Hell no, it is compressed a lot.
HDV? Hell no, is feels more compressed than DV.
HDCAM in 3:1:1?
HDCAM SR in 4:2:2?
Uncompressed HD 4:2:2? (is there such a format?)
DVCPro HD in 4:2:2?
What are all these formats, and wich one is "the closest" and comparable to DV compression in SD work? Are there any other "medium quality HD formats" I have failed to mention? Something with only I-frame compression?
I think I am going nuts...