Jump to content

Jay K Raja

Basic Member
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Occupation
    Director

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I'm doing a short film that I want to be suggestive of a film shot in the 70s and I'm trying to pick the best stock (Super 16) to achieve that. I've heard some things about the Fuji Eterna Vivid 160...how does that compare to Kodak Reversal stock? I know I'll have to do some work in the DI regardless, but what's a good stock to try and match that look best?
  2. It's not about coverage vs. one-shot...it's about choosing the right coverage. Check out how Ang Lee shoots many of the dialogue scenes in EAT DRINK MAN WOMAN. He uses long takes that subtly rack from one character to the next, only cutting when he needs to. Or any Kubrick film-he often takes very selected, minimal coverage, but never loses any information or dramatic thrust. Selected, smart coverage I think is almost always superior to shooting every angle possible in a scene and then assembling it in the editing room. Not only does this feel uncertain from a directorial standpoint, but it takes forever for that many setups on set.
×
×
  • Create New...