Jump to content

Joerg Polzfusz

Basic Member
  • Posts

    428
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Joerg Polzfusz

  1. Hi!

    All LEDs are emitting visible wavelengths. And the lightmeters are reading visible wavelengths, too. Hence, I don’t see any problems. (The lightmeters also don’t become inaccurate when you put colored gels in front of your halogen lamps - unless you are using orthochromatic films, infrared films/cameras or sensors that don’t react to certain colors.)

    However, due to the spike in the blue wavelengths in many products, LEDs might have an impact on the color temperatures. But you would have to check this with a color meter.

  2. 16 hours ago, Jordan B Moss said:

    My Nautica (not sure if there were multiple models) doesn't have TTL metering, it has a separate light meter above the lens.

    Yes, you’re right. Sorry, my mistake. I’ve last used my Nautica in the year 1 or 2 BC (before Covid-19) and I use too many different cameras. ?

    However, the camera knows when you have enabled the filter and automatically takes it into account for the auto-exposure. (Sorry, I have only got a German service manual.)

    416F3E36-E869-4ED7-AB96-5884AB21B7FE.jpeg

  3. 12 hours ago, Jordan B Moss said:

    It seems that the only way to have a cartridge rated at 40 or 100 is to turn on the daylight switch (which also turns on the orange filter).

    The camera simply assumes that all used films are 40 or 160 ASA Tungsten. It only differs between these two types. The camera doesn’t really know 25 and 100 ASA. These two values are only the effect of „Tungsten balanced films with enabled color correction filter“ (aka: the user has moved the orange switch to sun = the user has enabled the filter = there are 2/3 f-stops of light that don’t reach the film any more). But as the camera is using TTL lightmetering, it would automatically correctly compensate for all kinds of filters  .

    When using daylight balanced films in this camera, e.g. Vision3 50D or E100D, then the filter switch has to be set to „bulb“ (filter disabled) unless you want to pretend that you have filmed something on Mars. (As the camera‘s film sensitivity detector is rather simple, the V50D will be exposed at an okay 40ASA, while the E100D will be heavily overexposed at 160ASA.)

    For b&w films like the Tri-X, it‘s best to set the switch to „bulb“ - unless you want to use the color correction filter as an orange filter (e.g. for portraits or for increased contrast when shooting landscapes or buildings).

    Even though the Tri-X is officially rated as 200ASA, Kodak has notched it as 160ASA. That’s because of the Super8-standard that doesn’t define any notches for 200ASA. However, the Tri-X is working fine when exposed as 160ASA.

  4. I assume that the chemicals didn’t properly came in contact with the film all the time: not enough agitation, not enough chemicals (especially in combination with too much agitation and hence effects of the centrifugal force), film stuck on other parts of the film, …. But I am not an expert in this. 

  5. Did Logmar ever produce fully working cameras at all?

    Their first S8-camera only exists as prototypes (with non-working xlr-mic-connectors on all cameras, random or permanent problems with sound-recordings on various specimens,…). Their second S8-camera also only exists as prototypes (okay, this might have been Kodak’s fault and not Logmar‘s). And their third S8-camera simply got canceled a few weeks after the announcement…

  6. When 18fps is fine, you could also look out for a Canon 310xl (the non-af-version): f1.0 lens, 220° shutter, …

    https://global.canon/en/c-museum/product/cine291.html

    Pros: It’s very compact and light. And there’s an optional wide-angle adapter. It turns the camera into a „focus free“ system which is great for events with a lot of spontaneous action.
    Cons: This camera cannot be set to 24fps and its auto-exposure doesn’t support the Vision3 500T!

     

     

     

  7. Hi!

    There are a few things that you should keep in mind:

    * You can replace the Beaulieu‘s lens and use a lens with an f-stop of 0.9, 1.0, 1.2 or 1.4 instead of „only“ 1.8.

    * In most cameras, the TriX will be recognized as only 160ASA instead of its box speed (200ASA). That’s because of Kodak’s strange design of the cartridge notches and because many cameras can only differ between 40 and 160ASA. This is especially true for XL-cameras.

    * Some cameras will accidentally activate the internal Wratten 85 filter. This will only reduce the amount of light that reaches the film. But it is completely useless as the Wratten 85 is only meant  for tungsten balanced color films. (For B&W, it will act as an orange filter.) You might be able to manually deactivate it. And you should check whether you have deactivated it on your Beaulieu.

    * Most S8-cameras have a „permanent“, „non-flickering“ viewfinder. This means that it features a semi-transparent mirror that is permanently in place and is permanently causing a loss of 0.5 to 1.5 f-stops (depending on the camera) by redirecting a fraction of the light to the viewfinder.

    In other words: Simply switching to XL cameras might not improve the situation. What about using Vision3 500T? (Disadvantages: very large grain and not all cameras support 500 ASA.)

  8. The reason is that Canon changed the design and other features between the different cameras with „814“ in the name:
    https://global.canon/en/c-museum/camera.html?s=cine&s2=8mmcam

    One main difference between the 814XL-S and the other models named 814 is that the 814XL-S could record sound on the magnetic soundtracks (if their still is a company offering pre-striped S8-Films in the larger sound carts). Due to the additional weight caused by the sound recording parts, the need for a better handle is obvious. (Whether the 814XL-S' handle really is better is heavily debated ever since the camera’s release. ?)

     

    BTW: There are many S8 cameras where the batteries are stored inside the body instead of inside the handle. But this didn’t  prevent them from having problems caused by leaking batteries that caused corrosion of nearby cables. Not to mention that is majorly of cameras is 50 years old …

    In other words: It’s better to check the individual camera than to condemn whole models/brands.

  9. Hi!

    VirtualDub and its Deshaker plug-in are both „Windows only“.

    But there’s an older version of Mercalli for Mac (the demo adds a watermark, but you could at least see for free whether it solves the problem):

    https://www.prodad.com/Video-Stabilization-for-Professionals/Mercalli-SAL-Mac-48950,l-us.html

    Adobe AfterEffects are also available for the Mac. And there’s also a free trial: https://www.adobe.com/products/aftereffects/free-trial-download.html

  10. Hi!

    For many 35mm still photography cameras there have been special viewfinder magnifiers, e.g. this one: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/234516-REG/Leica_12004_Viewfinder_Magnifier_1_25x_for.html

    But I have not seen anything like this for your Beaulieu. The only accessory that comes to my mind is the „angle viewfinder“ that includes a small magnification, too. But it will change your way of working.

    I remember a generic viewfinder magnifier made by Seagull (China), a company that obviously went bankrupt 10 or more years ago. It came with some adapters that made it attachable to e.g. a Minolta Dynax 5 and a Fujica ZC1000 (like Seagull’s generic angle viewfinder). But I don’t know whether it came with a matching adapter for your Beaulieu. And if I remember correctly, at least on the Dynax 5, only 90% of the camera‘s viewfinder was visible. So some information, that was displayed at the viewfinder’s border, wasn’t visible with this magnifier anymore. 

×
×
  • Create New...