Jump to content

Reuel Gomez

Basic Member
  • Posts

    252
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Reuel Gomez

  1. I know I'm probably posting this on the wrong forum but I'm really interested in reading the articles included on the Die Hard Blu-Ray...except it seems to me that they aren't. I can't for the life of me find them anywhere despite the fact that they're advertised on the back o the case. Same thing goes for the full length screenplay (although I'm less interested in that)
  2. I wonder who will be hired for the job for Josh Trank's reboot
  3. I have a feeling the Superman/Batman film will be shot on film but only time will tell
  4. That Super Bowl TV spot, just...wow. I know what I'm doing June 27th.
  5. Unfortunately you are correct. Although, I do think it would've made more sense had Sony included a 4:3 sensor considering how many digital films are being shot using anamorphic lenses right now.
  6. I thought it had less than that...proves what I know...
  7. What does the Red Epic or any other digital camera offer as far as it's performance and cost as opposed to VistaVision and other large formats when it comes to plate/VFX work?
  8. If only it had a 4:3 sensor and a higher dynamic range...
  9. Then I wonder why Roger Deakins and many other people had such a problem with handholding the studio to the point where they opted for the original Alexa/Plus/Plus 4:3 and/or M cameras.
  10. If you think about it, it'd be kinda cool if you could shoot digital on a big VFX show like "Man of Steel" and then in post after all the VFX shots and color grading are completed, you could just throw in some grain after the fact. And who knows, maybe Arri will eventually come out with a camera with a mirror shutter with the ability to change between an optical and electronic viewfinder like the Studio but light enough to handhold.
  11. I think nowadays, unless you're shooting a period piece and using older lenses and grading to match some sort of older film stock or film, it makes no sense to say you're shooting film for that "retro" look which I feel doesn't exist. It's grain. It's the color rendition. It's the roll off into the highlights. That's the "film look" that I feel in a couple of years will be surpassed by digital systems, at least the last two things I mentioned. Maybe some film emulation technology will find some way to match film exactly, even going to far to exactly match specific film stocks like those from Kodak and Fuji. But for now, if you want that true film look...film is the way to go.
  12. You mean 200+ million dollar productions like Star Trek Into Darkness, Fast & Furious 6, Man of Steel, The Lone Ranger, The Hunger Games: Catching Fire, The Amazing Spider-Man 2, and Star Wars: Episode 7?
  13. And now it's being released in 2016, which sucks...
  14. What if someone is wearing a pair of Nike or Converse? If the logo is big enough and clearly visible and/or the design is unique enough, would that make a difference?
  15. As in designer clothes, do you mean any old brand like say Levi or Nike or something like Ralph Lauren or Calvin Klein?
  16. What about films based in the modern day here in America? Do the majority of those films buy their clothes or make them?
  17. One thing that I've always wondered is if clothes (not counting shoes) are made in house by the costume designer and wardrobe department or bought off the racks at stores. I don't mean just suits or dresses or costumes but everyday clothing like t-shirts or jeans.
  18. The trailer looks really good, but I'm kinda disappointed James Franco isn't in this one in even a cameo. But whatever. Fletcher Camera's website says that they used Arri Alexa M cameras with Leica Summilux-C's and Fujinon Premier zooms (not sure if its one of the regular zooms or the Cabrio zooms). Not sure what rigs they used though.
  19. Do you think it'd be a better investment to get the adapter or the filter?
×
×
  • Create New...