Jump to content

Nooman Naqvi

Basic Member
  • Posts

    90
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Nooman Naqvi

  1. Dear George,

     

    I have just emailed you the manual. I don't know about the motor, however I do have the 'Repair & Parts Manual for IIB & IIC Arriflex 35mm Cameras' manual also. That I can photocopy and send you via mail. Lemme know ur mailing address if interested.

     

    Nooman

  2. Wikipedia on Lollywood

     

    Sorry I m deviating from the main topic. I hope people do shed light on why the above two Pakistani movies have a horrible print quality. Film stock? etc.

     

    Now the pics. Photos taken in Feb 2001.

     

    Film projectors (which seem really old to me. I think a rod of lead had to be burned inside the projector as light source. These projectors didnt use bulbs).

     

    Lollywood-Lahore-Pakistan-Feb-2001-7.jpg

     

    Lollywood-Lahore-Pakistan-Feb-2001-1.jpg

     

    Lollywood-Lahore-Pakistan-Feb-2001-10.jpg

     

    Lollywood-Lahore-Pakistan-Feb-2001-6.jpg

     

    Lollywood-Lahore-Pakistan-Feb-2001-9.jpg

     

    Lollywood-Lahore-Pakistan-Feb-2001-8.jpg

     

     

    The film exhibition hall where cinemascope films were previewed.

    Lollywood-Lahore-Pakistan-Feb-2001-5.jpg

     

    Dolly shot.

    Lollywood-Lahore-Pakistan-Feb-2001-2.jpg

     

    Lollywood-Lahore-Pakistan-Feb-2001-3.jpg

     

     

    Set of a brothel before film shooting

    Lollywood-Lahore-Pakistan-Feb-2001-4.jpg

     

    35mm Arri 2C with a 1000ft magazine and an Angenieux 25 to 250mm zoom lens (I think)

    lollywood-feb-2001.jpg

  3. It should open up in Windows Media Player 9.0 or maybe you can download divx player.

     

    But the main question remains, why is the print quality of these films so horrible?

     

    But have you seen the prints? I bet the real film looks normal.

     

    No. This is just like the real film. Can you imagine that the real film being exhibited in cinema-houses is identically horrible.

     

    I visited Lollywood (Lahore, Pakistan) in 2001 and snapped some photos. I will post them here. I think the image-chain is made up of obsolete equipment.

  4. I have upload two small clips of Pakistani movies. All Pakistani movies have this horrible '1950s'/pale look. These movies were shot in year 200x, but their look & print looks so old. Is it because of film stock or lens or the chemicals used in development? Usually Arri 2C is the camera of choice for shooting movies in Pakistan.

     

    Your analysis will be highly appreciated.

     

    Movie 1 - 10 second clip

     

    Movie 2 - 10 second clip

  5. Thank you guys. This is tremendous help. and I will definately buy Dominic Case's book.

     

    One last question. The final product (reel) that is shipped to the theaters for screening, what film stock is that? Is it positive stock or is it simply known as "Print Films"?

     

     

    example?

     

    http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/products...d=0.1.4.8&lc=en

     

    or

     

    http://www.fujifilmusa.com/JSP/fuji/epartn...603437&product=

  6. What is the post-production process-flow for 35mm (film)?

     

    Is it:

     

    1. Film development after shoot.

    2. Film is scanned via a telecine machine. (whats the medium)?

    3. Scanned film is edited on a computer. (what software)?

    4. Film is written to 35mm reel for theatrical screening.? (what type/make/model of reel)?

     

     

    A confused film student :(

  7. Recently Arri unveilved their new Super 16mm film camera, Arriflex 416.

     

    Question is, will it accept any super 16mm film stock OR will it be like Aaton's A-minima & only accept a special film stock?

     

    416-Plus-Hero-Perspective.jpg

  8. I have the Arri IIC instructions manual. It was emailed to me by the kind staff at Arri USA. (free of cost ofcourse). God bless the staff at Arri!

     

     

    Note: tried to upload the manual here. Didnt work. Mods, can you please post it on the forum - Manuals section. I can email it to the mods

  9. How would you guys rate the film program at the University of Texas at Arlington?

     

    The one thing that really impressed me was that they make a 35mm feature film once every two years as part of practical/field training. and all the students get to participate in it. Would this satisfy the 'Film school VS making your own film" argument?

     

    http://www.uta.edu/art/filmvideo.html

     

    From their website

    "Every two years, the Department offers a fully-funded "Feature Film" experience. The most recent was shot in 35mm Panavision©. The films that emerge from this class have been screened in Hollywood at the Director's Guild of America as part of the highly competitive Texas Independents Showcase Competition."

×
×
  • Create New...