Alexandros Pissourios

I mean, ive made an initial grade using the HD transcodes in premiere using lumetri scopes and adjustments and got here But now I want to give it a bit more punch and clean the whites and blacks. I’m noticing that in some cases I can’t do it better than the initial attempt. the skies are better off without me touching them (ie the yellows and blues and pinks are better off with the initial lab grade) oh well... ill post the final/progress when I get there thanks for all the help!

I haven't got much self-confidence in grading yet and I really need to turn this around quickly, so I'm going to work on the HD uncompressed transcodes as they carry over the lab's best grade on them so it's pretty easy to work with. The 2K scans are just log scans and too grainy for me right now. The noise is pretty prominent in the 2k and its' not that it looks bad when graded, it's just too difficult to work with and get to a point I'm happy with. I might be able to upload some tests at some point soon! thank you!

Hi! I've shot 16mm films for a music video (250D and 500T) and I am now getting ready to grade. But I have a question... The 2K Uncompressed LOG scans look SO MUCH GRAINER when graded than the Uncompressed HD Prores files. It seems that the HD is a bit smoother and even bypasses the minor X-Ray Damage these rolls went through via traveling in Hold luggage. My question is whether I should go with what 'looks' better or try and work with 2K instead of HD no matter what because it's essentially better. This film is for online viewing and not TV or cinema... Here is an ungraded 2k clip and the HD (which i think has some work done by cinelab - best grade or technical grade - not sure) I'm finding the hd so much easier to work with... is it because i'm an amateur? lol I can upload graded stills if that helps make the point. ? Thank you! A

Thank you Stephen! Learning through costly mistakes here. Another thought is https://www.kodak.com/global/en/service/tib/tib5201.shtml I did travel with unprocessed (and) processed film in my checked bag twice before developing. Do you think that might be another reason too? I'm not trying to make excuses, it's just that I have so much more unprocessed film and I don't want to be wasting my money if I shoot more on it. I'm just a bit phased out how some films turned out just fine when my practice has been exactly the same shooting at least 50 rolls. Ideas?

Ouch ouch ouch so you think this is the reason. So stupid!!! How come this is just happened in the last batches and not from back when I first started using 16mm ( pure luck?) And lastly is there a way to save this footage? in grading? if so, how? oh thanks !

Hello there! I have been shooting 250D and 500T for a couple of projects and have been experiencing this disappointing mistake all around in my rushes. base fogging/fluctuation. OUCH. I have to admit I am NOT loading and unloading in a mini-tent nor in total darkness, but I do it indoors in low light. I store the films in their boxes afterward (but not in the fridge) and they are sent to development after a week or two. I know these sound like red flags but I've shot around 20 other films under the same conditions beforehand and they came out fine (minus the red light spills on the right-hand side of the image). I know, I'm learning by making mistakes. I'm curious why these last few rolls came back with the same issue. I have a H16 EL camera Could it be that my magazine is not closed properly (or has loosened up tiny bit and lets in light?) The lens mount also seems to be a bit loose now in relation to before (that's something that I noticed in the last couple of shoots) Could it be just bad loading/unloading Here are two examples of what I'm referring to: Many thanks!!! A