Daniel Madsen Posted May 5, 2006 Share Posted May 5, 2006 My friend found all the film he shot under fluorescents (the exterior shots were fine) to be two stops underexposed. Could this be a problem with the light meter he was using? Under what lighting condition do meters become unreliable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie Metzger Posted May 5, 2006 Share Posted May 5, 2006 There are so many variables involved. I thought a camera my friend let me use had an UV filter on it, and it turned out to be an ND 1.2; making it 4 stops under. His FPS could have gotten bumped up to 48 or 64 or 96, or his ISO speed could have gotten bumped up higher as well. The digital meters slip all the time with the passing of hands. It's usually operator error. Maybe the 1st left an Nd .6 in the tray from shooting outdoors? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Laurent Andrieux Posted May 5, 2006 Premium Member Share Posted May 5, 2006 My friend found all the film he shot under fluorescents (the exterior shots were fine) to be two stops underexposed. Could this be a problem with the light meter he was using? Under what lighting condition do meters become unreliable? This problem may be due to the way the metering was done or a wrong sensitivity computed in the meter. What stock or camera if video, was it shot with ? About the way it's metered : one has to be very carefull with counter lights (back lights). One should protect the meter from these light with his hands for metering. Another point is where you meter. Was the caracter where you metered, or did you meter closer to the lights than the caracter is ? my friend let me use had an UV filter on it, and it turned out to be an ND 1.2; making it 4 stops under. I don't believe a UV filter that cuts some much light. It cannot be a UV filter alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Sandstrom Posted May 5, 2006 Share Posted May 5, 2006 I don't believe a UV filter that cuts some much light. It cannot be a UV filter alone. it wasn't. it was an nd. he *thought* it was a uv. at least that's how i read it. /matt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Laurent Andrieux Posted May 5, 2006 Premium Member Share Posted May 5, 2006 Ok sorry - language missunderstanding - thought you ment "the UV filter was acting like a ND 1.2" while you ment "TWhat my friend thought was a UV filter was actually a ND 1.2" if I get I right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Andy Sparaco SOC Posted May 5, 2006 Premium Member Share Posted May 5, 2006 My friend found all the film he shot under fluorescents (the exterior shots were fine) to be two stops underexposed. Could this be a problem with the light meter he was using? Under what lighting condition do meters become unreliable? 1) Meters indeed become unreliable after the 15th hour of a 16 hour production day 2) After six beers after a 16 hour shooting day 3) After a 6 hour turn after six beers after a 16 hour shooting day. Also beware the light green tape applied to a mag which denotes 52/7201 will turn light blue like 52/7205 under Flourescent lights resulting in two stops under exposure....abetted by the 6 hour turn bla bla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william koon Posted May 7, 2006 Share Posted May 7, 2006 1) Meters indeed become unreliable after the 15th hour of a 16 hour production day2) After six beers after a 16 hour shooting day 3) After a 6 hour turn after six beers after a 16 hour shooting day. Also beware the light green tape applied to a mag which denotes 52/7201 will turn light blue like 52/7205 under Flourescent lights resulting in two stops under exposure....abetted by the 6 hour turn bla bla Can these make sense ? Somebody please help to explain further. I m afraid that these 3 explainations were written after hte 6 + 6 beers. Or we have to change meters every 16th hr. thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Laurent Andrieux Posted May 7, 2006 Premium Member Share Posted May 7, 2006 Well, it's clear to me ! After 16 hours, we have to change... day ! (and then have another couple of beers !) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Pritzlaff Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 1) Meters indeed become unreliable after the 15th hour of a 16 hour production day2) After six beers after a 16 hour shooting day 3) After a 6 hour turn after six beers after a 16 hour shooting day. You forgot Number 4 4 After a 16hour day with a 16 hour day before with a 6hour turnaround and 6 beers between the two. THe light meter will be completly wrong and is only readable after 6 more beers are consumed. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Laurent Andrieux Posted May 9, 2006 Premium Member Share Posted May 9, 2006 Well, anyway, after 16 hours of work, you don't need any lightmeter anymore, as to determine exposure, do you ? B) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now