Jason McKelvey Posted September 3, 2004 Share Posted September 3, 2004 If you could only pick three 35mm lenses, which three lenses would you pick... one wide for handheld/Steadicam, one for close-ups and one for telephoto? Also, does anyone know where I can find a chart or formula for 35mm focal length to 2/3" video conversion? Thanks! Jason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member David Mullen ASC Posted September 3, 2004 Premium Member Share Posted September 3, 2004 That depends on your tastes. With only three lenses, you may have to live with big jumps in focal lengths, so either it would be something like: 25mm, 50mm, 100mm. Or it would be closer together like: 35mm, 50mm, 85mm. On the other hand, if you had a lot of Steadicam, you may need the 25mm. It all depends on if you prefer working at the wide-angle end or the telephoto end, stylistically. While I think a 35mm is great for masters, it's not always wide enough for some locations. Typically, an 85mm or 100mm would be used for close-ups. You can shoot close-ups with a 50mm but it starts to get less attractive on some actresses unless they are loose close-ups. You may do something less even in steps, like: 25mm, 50mm, 85mm. But the truth is that you are more likely going to want something like: 25mm, 35mm, 50mm, 85mm, 100mm as a set. Unless you have a zoom to complement the three lenses. There's a calculator for converting focal lengths here (below) but I can't seem to load the website right now: www.panavision.co.nz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew McDermott Posted September 3, 2004 Share Posted September 3, 2004 There's a conversion chart on Abel Cine's website. You can't directly link to it because of the way the site is set up, but it's in the rental section under HD/SD lenses. Their link is www.abelcine.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Adam Frisch FSF Posted September 3, 2004 Premium Member Share Posted September 3, 2004 I'd probably bring the 27mm, the 40mm and a 65 or 85mm. You could shoot an entire movie with just that and and never really have to "want" anything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Michael Nash Posted September 3, 2004 Premium Member Share Posted September 3, 2004 I think David pretty much nailed the focal lengths. Probably the most useful scenario would be 25, 50, 85. But all the exceptions he mentioned still apply -- I love using a 35 a lot. For focal length conversions, just remember that 16mm is almost exactly half of 35mm, and 2/3" video is almost the same as 16 but a little shorter. So in other words, a 50 in 35mm would look like a 25 in 16mm, and a 21 in 2/3" video. In practice, 2/3" video usually uses a zoom lens (unless now you're using primes on HD), so cut your 35mm focal lengths in half a la 16mm, and adjust the zoom a little for the shot. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GWilliamPatrickB Posted October 18, 2004 Share Posted October 18, 2004 If you could only pick three 35mm lenses, which three lenses would you pick... one wide for handheld/Steadicam, one for close-ups and one for telephoto? Also, does anyone know where I can find a chart or formula for 35mm focal length to 2/3" video conversion?Thanks! Jason <{POST_SNAPBACK}> What ever lens I picked I would make sure they were MACROS! I own a 16mm converted by Focus Optics and a 60mm. So all three would be capable of moving in real close. My choices 16mm macro 50 mm macro and 85 mm macro. Depth of field discussions are for another day. GWPB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now