Jump to content

best HD camera for filmmaking?


Nicholas Katzakis

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

 

I know this has probably been asked a million times but I'm looking to start an HD filmmaking production company and I'd like to know which camera is considered the best for filmmaking.

 

I'm looking for a solution which allows the same depth of fields as 35mm film, even if that means using a DOF adapter (like P+S Technik). If money isn't the issue, what's the best option for the filmmaker. Which HD camera produces the best film look?

 

If this has already been answered someplace else or on a review on the web, please point me to the right direction.

 

Thanks in advance,

 

Nick

Greece

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
We'll be receiving a generous subsidy for this startup. To be honest we're looking to spend under 100k ( for both camera, DOF adapter if necessary, and a couple of lenses).

 

I'd forget the DOF adaptor and get in line for a RED camera... it does 720P, 1080P, 2K, and 4K, multiple frame rates, and the body only costs $17,500. With basic accessories and some RED lenses, you're still way under your under-100K budget. See:

http://www.red.com/cameras.shtml

 

Downside, you aren't going to be able to get it right away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest will griffith

I agree with Mr Mullen because even on commercial shoots the Mini and other adapters

can be a real pain and leave your image soft and grainy.

 

However...

From what I've seen this adapter seems to be super sharp and much less hassle than other DOF adapters. JVC HZ-CA13U Film Lens Adapter

Only works with JVC cams, but may be worth renting and testing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
From what I've seen this adapter seems to be super sharp and much less hassle than other DOF adapters. JVC HZ-CA13U Film Lens Adapter

Only works with JVC cams, but may be worth renting and testing.

 

If you look at the FOV charts here:

http://pro.jvc.com/prof/attributes/feature...el_id=MDL101683

 

The adaptor preserves the FOV of the same lens when on a 16mm camera (which is similar to a 2/3" CCD camera) not a 35mm camera. So the depth of field characteristics are halfway between 1/3" CCD and 35mm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest will griffith
The adaptor preserves the FOV of the same lens when on a 16mm camera (which is similar to a 2/3" CCD camera) not a 35mm camera. So the depth of field characteristics are halfway between 1/3" CCD and 35mm.

I wasn't arguing that. It's just nice because you can use decent glass (not 35mm obviously)

and don't have to worry about spinning glass, extra batteries, etc. And you get something

much sharper than any other DOF adapter.

 

It doesn't give you 35mm DOF, but ANYTHING is an improvement over 1/3" chips. :)

 

>IF< the Red camera was available then it would be perfect for indies with this kind of budget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Varicam H with two Canon primes FJs9 and FJs14 plus a Cinestyle zoom 11x4,7 KLL for the rest of the focal lengths, a matte box, a set of NDs in order to operate wide open, a good tripod, a Panasonic LCD with Gamma correction, and a FCS2 package for HD online and finishing. VTR not needed, you will rent it every time you need it, all the rest (i.e. TV commercials) directly capture from camera.

 

Varicam will give you 11,5 stops latitude something like 0,4 less than Viper and about 2,7 more than Cinealta, JVC, Canon etc. As for resolution with 1,85:1 the 720 lines are enough for film projection. The look and feel of the image is very cinematic when transferred to film with LOG processing.

 

RED question is remain to be seen, the latitude as for now is 2 stops less than Varicam, the extra resolution doesn?t come out of the Cinema projector so wait and see, if you can wait until next year?

 

The above proposition is around 140000$

 

If you select JVC style camera take a look also to HVX200 or 500

 

PS. With the above lenses wide open you have the some shallow depth of field like 35mm in 2,8 1/3 so no need for adapters...

Edited by Evangelos Achillopoulos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn?t notice that you are from Greece?

 

Sorry Nichola

 

The Varicam set is out of question in Greece it costs more than 190000?.

 

Check the HPX500 and the rest of the package? only the lenses will be at 58000? the camera to 30000? and the Mac at 12000? so you are their.

 

Call me if you like at 6932834153 if you want to visit me to show you same footage with our film transfer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd forget the DOF adaptor and get in line for a RED camera... it does 720P, 1080P, 2K, and 4K, multiple frame rates, and the body only costs $17,500. With basic accessories and some RED lenses, you're still way under your under-100K budget. See:

http://www.red.com/cameras.shtml

 

Downside, you aren't going to be able to get it right away.

That looks really nice. What media does it record to HDcam HardDrive?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
Money is always a question, so what's your budget?

The other important question is schedule.

 

If you'll only really use the camera for a few weeks or months shooting a feature, it can make more sense to rent. If you own it between pictures, during pre production and post, the value of the camera isn't earning any interest, and it's not being used. A rental camera would be out on other shoots at that time, making money for the rental company. The value they provide in return is that they eat the depreciation and take the risk on obsolescence. They also maintain their equipment between rentals, and provide technical support. That's why rental is the way the vast majority of feature films and even TV shows go.

 

OTOH, if you'll be shooting things like stock footage or time lapse, there may be circumstances in which it makes more sense to own a camera.

 

 

 

-- J.S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other important question is schedule.

 

If you'll only really use the camera for a few weeks or months shooting a feature, it can make more sense to rent. If you own it between pictures, during pre production and post, the value of the camera isn't earning any interest, and it's not being used. A rental camera would be out on other shoots at that time, making money for the rental company. The value they provide in return is that they eat the depreciation and take the risk on obsolescence. They also maintain their equipment between rentals, and provide technical support. That's why rental is the way the vast majority of feature films and even TV shows go.

 

OTOH, if you'll be shooting things like stock footage or time lapse, there may be circumstances in which it makes more sense to own a camera.

-- J.S.

And to add to that, owning a camera like the RED, would give you good opportunity for "Camera for Hire Freelancing." If you line up enough jobs you could earn back the value of the camera in fair amount of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...