Premium Member Adam Thompson Posted November 13, 2007 Premium Member Share Posted November 13, 2007 When the sissy soldier character "Opum" (spelling?) finally gets the balls to shoot the Nazi they earlier spared, near the end, the highlights smear upward on his shot. I was wondering if anyone knows if this was a filter or was it a post effect. I've seen a plug-in for FCP that will do it but is it mimicing a real filter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Kevin Zanit Posted November 13, 2007 Premium Member Share Posted November 13, 2007 Do a search, been discussed a ton before (as have many of the other techniques used in SPR). It is from throwing the camera's movement out of phase with the shutter so that the camera is pulling down a new frame while the shutter is still partially open. The camera pulls the film down vertically, and thus the streaks are vertical as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member David Mullen ASC Posted November 13, 2007 Premium Member Share Posted November 13, 2007 It's due to a deliberately mistimed shutter in the camera. Normally, the shutter is supposed to close over the gate before the movement advances the film to the next frame, to then be exposed when the shutter moves again to uncover the gate. But if the shutter is mistimed, the movement starts to advance to the next frame while the shutter is still moving to cover the gate, so the last percentage of the exposure on the frame is streaked. Since only the brightest objects in the frame have time to register in this brief moment, what you see are bright highlights streaking upwards vertically. There are supposedly some post filters that simulate this effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamey Johnson Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 The new Magic Bullet Looks has a "shutter streak" preset that is pretty close to the effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Brad Grimmett Posted November 13, 2007 Premium Member Share Posted November 13, 2007 Anyone know if Kaminski compensated for the slight exposure difference when shooting the mistimed shutter stuff? Is there even enough difference to bother compensating, or does it depend on just how far out of sync the shutter is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Kelly Posted December 15, 2007 Share Posted December 15, 2007 oh yeah I bet someone has done that math.. always worth testing yourself tho. You can take the shutter completely out of a Mitchell.... kind of extreme, but nifty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now