Stewart Munro Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 hey there im looking a getting 1 of these 2 lens im really want to get a fisheye for my super 16 k3. please could you tell me one will be the best one to get?please MC Peleng 3.5/8A FISHEYE Lens ISH-EYE ZENITAR M 2.8/16 LENS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Alvin Ekarma Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 You're going to need both since the Peleng can distort and is slow and the Zenitar isn't wide enough. But if money is an issue, go for the Zenitar if you can't come across a 17mm takumar. (And bear in mind the issues with dealing with these lenses i.e. flaring and you'll need to rig up some kind of filter threading system since they're shaped oddly.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewart Munro Posted January 18, 2008 Author Share Posted January 18, 2008 will both theres lens fit straight on to my camera and be ready to film? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Alvin Ekarma Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 Hopefully. My zenitar had to be properly collimated before I could use it, dodgey quality control and all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Will Montgomery Posted January 22, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted January 22, 2008 K-3 are rarely (if ever) actually converted to S16 properly by recentering the lens mount, so your distortions are going to be slightly unevenly distributed. Especially on the Peleng 8mm, you'll see more distortion in the Super 16 expanded right side than the left side. I only notice it on that lens, not really on the Mir 16mm lens I have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kristian Schumacher Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 K-3 are rarely (if ever) actually converted to S16 properly by recentering the lens mount, so your distortions are going to be slightly unevenly distributed. Especially on the Peleng 8mm, you'll see more distortion in the Super 16 expanded right side than the left side. I only notice it on that lens, not really on the Mir 16mm lens I have. Hi! Just wanted to point out that Les Bosher did a very good job at an s16 conversion with a recentered Nikon mount on my K-3. I guess the gate only conversion is simple enough to do on your kitchen table, so tempting to many. But the cost was not too bad for having it done properly. Kristian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Will Montgomery Posted February 1, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted February 1, 2008 Just wanted to point out that Les Bosher did a very good job at an s16 conversion with a recentered Nikon mount on my K-3. I guess the gate only conversion is simple enough to do on your kitchen table, so tempting to many. But the cost was not too bad for having it done properly. Good to hear someone can do it right. I've found a major difference in shooting Super 16 vs. Regular 16 when my lighting conditions are less than they should be. I do get tired of winding that camera though... looking forward to a motor solution if it ever is released. I missed out on Clive's motors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Beswick Posted June 10, 2008 Share Posted June 10, 2008 I wouldn't bother with the zenitar 16mm fisheye f2.8 for your krasnogorsk, a 28mm prime seems to look just as wide and 28mm macros are also availiable so you can have subjects very close. trust me, i paid £115 for my fish-eye and i only use it on my 35mm slr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Will Montgomery Posted June 10, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted June 10, 2008 I wouldn't bother with the zenitar 16mm fisheye f2.8 for your krasnogorsk, a 28mm prime seems to look just as wide and 28mm macros are also availiable so you can have subjects very close. trust me, i paid £115 for my fish-eye and i only use it on my 35mm slr Ummmm, there would be a major difference between a 16mm and a 28mm prime on a K3. If you don't believe it just take the stock zoom lens and look at the difference between 17 and 28mm. The 16mm actually works well on the K3 if you have the cheap Super 16 mod (just a wider gate) as it is slightly wider than the stock lens but covers the entire Super 16 area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Beswick Posted June 12, 2008 Share Posted June 12, 2008 Ummmm, there would be a major difference between a 16mm and a 28mm prime on a K3. If you don't believe it just take the stock zoom lens and look at the difference between 17 and 28mm. The 16mm actually works well on the K3 if you have the cheap Super 16 mod (just a wider gate) as it is slightly wider than the stock lens but covers the entire Super 16 area. yeah, there is obviously a difference because there not the same focal length. The would probably be nice results with a s-16 gate, but the 17-69 that come with your kraz is wide and fast. just something to consider i suppose. Not much i can say though i suppose because i only have a standard 16 gate. if your buying it from e-bay, dont go off the pictures featured to judge what you will be getting because is litterally a tiny portion out of the middle of the picture that u'd be getting. they tend to put full frame digi slr snaps up to reel you in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now