Anna Uio Posted January 17, 2009 Share Posted January 17, 2009 Hi all, I often see dynamic range values thrown around in discussion, and I wonder what's standard. What is a typical dynamic range for film? What is the highest dynamic range for film? What's typical prosumer camera have? What about a typical consumer level camera? Just trying to get the big picture here :) Cheers, Anna Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member David Mullen ASC Posted January 17, 2009 Premium Member Share Posted January 17, 2009 Trouble is that there is the measurable range and then there's the practical range. Measurable range includes information buried in noise or grain, usually detail that drops away once you get the blacks nice and rich and the whites nice and clean. Practical range is much smaller, tends to be the range you can can count on getting usable detail for color-correction... and the range is narrowed even further when you factor in the contrast of the display system you've chosen. So color negative film has a measurable dynamic range of some 14+ stops, maybe even 15-stops, the highest end digital cine cameras like the F23 has something close to 12-stops measured, maybe the Genesis as well, the RED ONE measures to something like 11-stops, the F-900 around 10 or 11-stops, and most consumer cameras more in the 9-stop range. But the practical range is narrower, I'd knock at least a stop off either end of those ranges I mentioned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Martin Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 My personal experience with the lower-end of things (HDV) has led me to believe they've maybe 5 or 6 stops (that's what I call 5 or 6 stops... not what a chart tells me). I've also heard it on good authority that negative film has an inherent range of 7 stops - three over, three under. My experiments with stills 35mm have more-or-less shown this to be true with, as expected, extra room if you're willing to take more noise/grain. How motion picture stocks stack up against that, I don't know, although I believe they "cheat" somewhat by including slow/medium/fast emulsions for each colour... perhaps Lord Mullen could shine some light on this? :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member David Mullen ASC Posted January 18, 2009 Premium Member Share Posted January 18, 2009 Practical experience generally tells me that something has to be about five-stops over to go white or five under to go black on color negative film, so I consider that a workable 10-stop range, maybe 11-stops -- there is some detail beyond that range of course. With digital cameras, generally things start to burn-out even just three stops under, if not less, but the low end range is about the same as film. On color negative film, a caucasian face that is accidentally overexposed by three-stops is still correctable, but with most digital cameras, there is too much highlight detail lost with that much overexposure to be correctable back to normal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salil Sundresh Posted January 20, 2009 Share Posted January 20, 2009 (edited) Trouble is that there is the measurable range and then there's the practical range. Measurable range includes information buried in noise or grain, usually detail that drops away once you get the blacks nice and rich and the whites nice and clean. Practical range is much smaller, tends to be the range you can can count on getting usable detail for color-correction... and the range is narrowed even further when you factor in the contrast of the display system you've chosen. So color negative film has a measurable dynamic range of some 14+ stops, maybe even 15-stops, the highest end digital cine cameras like the F23 has something close to 12-stops measured, maybe the Genesis as well, the RED ONE measures to something like 11-stops, the F-900 around 10 or 11-stops, and most consumer cameras more in the 9-stop range. But the practical range is narrower, I'd knock at least a stop off either end of those ranges I mentioned. Kodak claims film has 20 stops of dynamic range? Does anyone have any idea how this could be true? Isn't the human eye only like 18 stops? If we could shoot on stocks with 20 stops of dynamic range, that would mean big roles of ND would be obsolete in many cases...yet it still seems like this stuff is used quite a bit. Is this 20 stop dynamic range only for some super expensive imax stock or...? Click the 10 fast facts link, fact #3 http://motion.kodak.com/US/en/motion/Produ...on_16/index.htm Edited January 20, 2009 by Salil Sundresh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Martin Posted January 20, 2009 Share Posted January 20, 2009 I believe larger format film, black and white, processed in some strange way and with some very generous definitions of "acceptable noise" COULD theoretically give film 20 stops. However, even die-hard film lovers that I know call that something of marketing BS on Kodak's part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now