J. Anthony Gonzales Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 I brought this up in a B/W thread, but I am curious as pertains to color film. Kodak recomends a 82B filter when shooting tungsten film under 3000 lights. Just curious how much "redder than normal" will it look without the filter? Thanks, John G. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Chris Keth Posted January 6, 2005 Premium Member Share Posted January 6, 2005 I brought this up in a B/W thread, but I am curious as pertains to color film. Kodak recomends a 82B filter when shooting tungsten film under 3000 lights. Just curious how much "redder than normal" will it look without the filter? Thanks, John G. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It'll look a little warmer, but not drastic. I think that's probably about the smallest color temp difference that you would notice, in all honesty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member David Mullen ASC Posted January 6, 2005 Premium Member Share Posted January 6, 2005 No one would bother filtering the camera for such a small color temp difference unless they were shooting color reversal and were projecting the original, such as for slide photography. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member John Pytlak RIP Posted January 6, 2005 Premium Member Share Posted January 6, 2005 The amount of color you see in the filter approximates the color difference you would see without correction. Such a small change is easily corrected during color timing/grading of a color negative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now