Igor Trajkovski Posted April 9, 2011 Share Posted April 9, 2011 "Cameron, whose 2009 sci-fi blockbuster raised the bar for digital imagery and put the 3-D craze on the fast track, said Thursday that "Avatar 2" would be shot at 48 or 60 frames a second to reduce an effect called "strobing" that can blur moving images, particularly those in 3-D. For more than 80 years, the norm has been 24 frames a second. In a demonstration for theater owners at their CinemaCon convention, Cameron played 3-D footage he recently shot at 24, 48 and 60 frames a second to show the better quality of high-speed filming." "... Cameron, who wants faster filming rates to become the standard for 2-D and 3-D movies." Full read here: Cameron aims for speed to enrich 'Avatar 2' images --- Changing aestetics? There was the craze for getting the film look out of video/electronic cameras. Going from the video/news/TV 50i/60i look into the framerate realm of film. 24/25/30p abilities were in and norm. For 3-D i can understand as a technical concern and as explained a more pleasurable experience, but how would we feel with more images per second while watching a 2-D theater movie? Regards Igor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now