Jarin Blaschke Posted March 15, 2004 Share Posted March 15, 2004 As standard practice, I usually rate color film lower than the factory setting to enrich contrast, reduce apparent grain and gain good, strong blacks. It's also a type of exposure safety. I will be shooting an upcoming black and white piece and I'm wondering if this is still good practice. I imagine I'll likely get good blacks, but I've heard that grain actually increases when 'over' exposing black and white. Is this true? What else might I expect? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member John Pytlak RIP Posted March 15, 2004 Premium Member Share Posted March 15, 2004 With a B&W camera negative film, graininess does increase slightly with increasing exposure. Here is the granularity curve for 5222 (RMS granularity is the red curve): http://www.kodak.com/US/plugins/acrobat/en...es/5222Diff.pdf And 5231: http://www.kodak.com/US/plugins/acrobat/en...es/5231Diff.pdf Best to give a "normal" exposure at the rated EI. Underexposure will give lower density "smoky" blacks in the final print, where grain will be more visible. But gross overexposure will put scene information (especially highlights) on a grainier portion of the film's characteristic curve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominic Case Posted March 16, 2004 Share Posted March 16, 2004 But gross overexposure will put scene information (especially highlights) on a grainier portion of the film's characteristic curve. John I know this is true - but can you explain _why_ the highlight part of the curve is grainier in b/w emulsions? It's different from the way colour emulsions work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now