Anthony Schilling Posted October 31, 2005 Share Posted October 31, 2005 (edited) I posted these on anither forum, but thought I'd put some here too for those who are interested in seeing the new stock. Canon 512XL, 85B filter.. workprinter transfer. Here's another Edited October 31, 2005 by Skratch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erdwolf_TVL Posted October 31, 2005 Share Posted October 31, 2005 Thanks a lot! Do post more if you can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.Oliver Posted October 31, 2005 Share Posted October 31, 2005 Hi, still 25ft of 64t to use up before i get to see a projected 64t result. How does it compare to k40, it looks grainy and flat to me. Is it sharper than k40? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andres victorero Posted October 31, 2005 Share Posted October 31, 2005 (edited) looks good, you can post some pic of man-girl face? thanks Edited October 31, 2005 by andres victorero Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthony Schilling Posted October 31, 2005 Author Share Posted October 31, 2005 It's grainier than K-40... I'd put it between 7240 and K-40 in terms of that. A bit more saturation and detail. It's also lower contrast and better to transfer. The grain tightens up real nice in sunlight with nice colors. going to do some tungston tests soon. With the exception of increase grain (not too bothersome) I like it better than K40... but still wonder if 7285 100D may have been better for grain, saturation, and more modern looking than 64T. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.Oliver Posted October 31, 2005 Share Posted October 31, 2005 I have used a couple of 16mm rolls of 7285 circuschrome, it looks great in daylite compared to 16mm k40. And it should look great for super 8 too. Although the 16mm image was clean, it seemed less sharp than k40. Colours are not natural compared to k40, way oot. Why oh why couldnt kodak give us a modern E6 100d film for super 8 instead of there old 64t film, obviously found a stock pile of 64t and decided to dump it on us super 8 users. As kodak wish to save money, why didnt they dump 64t,100d, and use their latest E6 slide film for super 8 and 16mm, then dump 16mm k40. ( sorry 16mm k40 will be dumped soon anyway) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Christopher Heston Posted October 31, 2005 Share Posted October 31, 2005 Hi, I love the greens, and the detail of the leaf is great. What camera did you use?? What was the lighting really like? What f-stop was the camera on for the stills?? -Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthony Schilling Posted November 1, 2005 Author Share Posted November 1, 2005 Hi, I love the greens, and the detail of the leaf is great. What camera did you use?? What was the lighting really like? What f-stop was the camera on for the stills?? -Chris Overcast, dreary day. Canon 512XL f4 on the leaf, 5.6 on the green. I still have 2 carts of pro8mm 100D. going to have them processed somewhere else and see if I can get a better example and compare with 64T soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andres victorero Posted November 1, 2005 Share Posted November 1, 2005 Overcast, dreary day. Canon 512XL f4 on the leaf, 5.6 on the green. I still have 2 carts of pro8mm 100D. going to have them processed somewhere else and see if I can get a better example and compare with 64T soon. sounds awesome :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now