Jump to content

David W Scott

Basic Member
  • Posts

    132
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by David W Scott

  1. I won't comment about the girls :P However, I do own one of the same Chinons, so I will give a word of warning. I used that camera to shoot B-Roll for a documentary project. However, the weather was really hot, and the rubber eyecup almost instantaneously turned to goop. It slimed all over the viewfinder and back of the camera. (I still have to find a good way to clean it off...) So I would recommend you remove the eyecup before taking the camera anywhere hot. (I know that some rubber will go bad no matter what, but the heat really seemed to accelerate the process) :blink: This camera is an XL, so it lets in a lot of light. I shot Tri-X in deeply wooded Vermont, and got great exposures. For a sunny beach I would take Plus-X, and maybe an ND screwed onto the lens. Dave
  2. While I don't share your fervent Kodachromeophilia, I agree with you about Joe Public's concern over longevity. OT: After reading about DVD-R lifespans that range from a high of 5 years to a low of 3 months, I have advised my family to not keep any important movies or photos on DVD-R. As a result, my Dad went through his DVD home movies and found 3 discs from the last year that will no longer play. I feel sorry for folks who have moved to such fragile media to shoot/store their memories. They won't have anything to show their kids, let alone their grand kids :( I think there will be a great panic in a few years when Joe Public realizes what has happened to their home movies... it's too late to start backing up discs or putting images on sturdier media when the originals are dead.
  3. Of course, you are right. :rolleyes: I shouldn't rely on memory for these things! I went back to Chris Malkiewicz ("Cinematography") and he says that a Caucasian has 35% reflectance and a black face less than 18% (varying of course by skin tone.) So if you are metering off their faces, the white face needs at least half a stop more to keep from darkening to grey, and the black face needs at least half a stop less than metered to keep it from lightening to grey. That's how I confused myself though.... I was thinking about metering with an incident meter, or using a grey card. In which case, you might need to open up a touch to get a nice exposure on a black face. Sorry for the confusion!
  4. I'm also too late for your project, but here's a couple of things to note: You were getting the same lightmeter reading from your friend's white face and from the 18% grey card because 18% grey will approximate the light reflected off a white person's skin. So, it simply means that your light meter is accurate and that your friend has average caucasian skin tone. If you are filming someone of any other complexion (i.e. darker skinned), you may need to open up the aperture a little more. Your internal light meter will be averaging the exposure for either the whole frame, or it will be weighted towards metering the centre of the frame. You can tell by aiming at a really bright object against a darker neutral background. First, centre the camera on the bright object. Then, wiggle the camera around. If the internal meter immediately drops down when the bright object is not perfectly centred, then you have a centre-weighted meter. If the meter does not drop down until the bright object starts to go out of frame, then you have a frame-averaging meter. Once you have decided which kind of meter you have, you can judge more accurately what the camera is metering for. No matter what kind of meter you have, the best thing to do is to zoom in on your subject to get a more accurate reading. Of course, if your goal is to simply expose the faces correctly, then zoom in on the faces, set and lock the aperture, and zoom out to your desired frame. To get a better idea of how your final image will be exposed, zoom in on different parts of the frame. Zoom in to the darkest shadow, and note what the aperture reads as. Zoom into the brightest highlight, and note what the aperture is. Zoom in to the subject that you would like to expose for (or anything that is the same colour and in the same lighting) and note what the aperture is. With these three numbers, you will be able to answer some questions: Are my darkest or lightest areas radically different than my subject? How much of the final frame is like the darkest, lightest or middle exposure? If you are shooting reversal film stock, there is very little leeway for exposure. If your brightest or darkest areas are more than 2 or 3 f-stops different than your subject, they will begin to disappear into blacks and whites. If you are shooting negative stock, you have a lot more leeway, and will be able to see deeper into the shadows and highlights. The formal way to control exposure in this manner is called "the zone system". You needn't be as rigorous as the "zone system" but it is a great way to think about exposures and consider your choices as more than a single f-stop setting for a whole shot. Looking at your exposure this way is especially important to achieve the look you want when you are shooting wide shots. (By wide shot, I mean anything where you can see a full human figure or more.) If you can get a cheap external meter, they are very useful. You will most likely get an incident meter, which means that the meter is designed to be held where your subject will be. The light that falls on your subject should fall on your meter, with it facing towards the camera. To get a better sense of the lights and darks in your exposure while using an incident meter, you will need to walk around the shot, metering in the darkest areas and the brightest (basically, walking around to the same places I had you zoom in to when you used the internal camera meter above.) Everywhere you take a reading with the incident meter, it should give you the same reading as though you had held an 18% grey card in that spot and zoomed in to check exposure with your camera. There are lots of resources out there, plenty to get you up to speed quickly. The most useful ones for you at this point will actually be books on still photography. They will get you up to speed on metering and exposures. I also recommend Lenny Lipton's book, if it's not already on your syllabus. Best of luck, Dave
  5. I just got my first test roll of E64T back. Kodak recommends using an 85B filter. I opted to use a Cokin 85B, out of convenience because I already have a filter stage for my Super 8 camera, and didn't have to buy an odd-ball screw-in filter. My daylight footage was oddly coloured. To my eyes, highlights were kind of pink. The shadows were bluish, even with the 85B and really warm, sunset colour temperatures. Tungsten footage (obviously exposed with no filter) had very accurate colour rendering. I was extremely impressed. Of course, YMMV.
  6. Alive and getting better! :D The proof? * Three new stocks from Kodak (including two of their premium negative stocks), with possibly more coming. * The repatriation of Super 8 manufacturing to Rochester (should be complete by the end of the year). * Two new magazines devoted to Super 8 ("Super 8 Today" and "Smallformat") * Super 8 short film selected for Cannes ("The Man Who Met Himself") For more links and info, go to www.filmshooting.com and check out the forums. All the best, Dave
  7. Question for Phil and Thomas: What NLE are you guys using? I am looking for a way to "interpret" 30fps footage as 24fps footage in Final Cut Pro. I used to be able to do this trick in Premiere with a DPS Perception system, but since moving to FCP I haven't been able to find a way to make this work. Ideas? :blink: Thanks, Dave
×
×
  • Create New...