Yeah, Charlie, I think I could. Not to be critical of you or your work, but all of those images you posted are "soft" and they lack the resolution of film. Too, the lack latitude is obvious, especially in the shot of the girls sitting next to the water.
Oh, what the heck. I'll take your challenge, not because I have "golden eyeballs," but because I think there is a difference and it would show in a side by side comparison between video and a 35mm still. In fact, I'll contribute an example myself--we both can!
I'll shoot some object around the house here, no need to go downtown, with video. I'll be using an Canon XL2, 16:9, 24p (2:3:3:2), unless you'd rather I use some other setting. Then I will shoot a still of the same object using a Nikon 35mm camera and Kodacolor negative film.
This might even be fun!
Jay