Hello,
I'm thinking about shooting a low budget film with Kodak 16mm black and white stock, but I'm not sure whether I should use negative or reversal film. It's mostly woods exteriors in daylight with a few interiors and night scenes. I would probably be trying to use as much natural light as possible, and I know that Kodak's new reversals are faster than their negatives, but how do they compare in contrast, detail and grain size? I might try to have a blow up made for festival screenings, and I'm interested in hearing what anyone has to say about what I should expect one way or the other (including cost differences). And any general thoughts (about lab costs, telecine or personal opinion) would be greatly appreciated.
I don't know if this has been discussed a million times before, but I haven't really found any specific examples. If it has, please feel free to kick me in that direction.
Sam