Jump to content

connor denning

Basic Member
  • Posts

    115
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by connor denning

  1. maybe I'm reading it to this wrong but that would explain why (along with what the scene called for) if you have a longer shutter speed, you're going to have more motion blur, so moving slower to hid that makes sense.
  2. Didn't they have sync motors that worked at 16ish fps.
  3. I'm assuming global draw is the LCD display, or the on screen FX?
  4. meant doesn't it allow you to shoot at higher resolution for longer on raw? It should easy the buffer but if there's some firmware limitation or something I'm forgetting it should work...
  5. It's not as much that but that The way I'm doing it is doing it with the money I have to spend, witch won't turn out a well as it could. I did not here a rumor about it, I heard that they where instructed to move slowly from an interview with one of the actors in the film. I'd rather not undercrank my camera but I may have have to get it properly exposed under conditions I may have to film under, like simple or no lighting set up (because I may or may not have permission to shoot there And I'd rather not push it) early in the night trying to have it look like natural light, even if theres some noise at least have it exposed properly, I mean as long as you know you're shooting at a low frame rate it's not to hard to hid, or I'm I missing something?
  6. And will it let me record at higher resolutions at 16 than at 24 fps?
  7. If I do fps override is it possible to sync it to a external audio recorder?
  8. I saw the movie in much better quality, A lot of it looks under cracked. On top of that I know the actors where told to move very slowly and to make no sudden moments because it would look too choppy, and to much motion blur. Compared to the rest of the movie it seemed to be at a lower frame rate. But I just want to know if lowering the frame rate on magic lantern to use lower shutter speeds, like is it limited to 1/30 even if it's set to 10 fps? cause with out magic lantern it's limted to 1/30 even when set to 24 fps.
  9. on magic lantern dose it allow lower frame rates in an arbtary way like (15, 16, 17 fps)? and dose it let you have a longer exposure like 1/16 sec rather than 1/24 or 1/30. I'm not not talking about time lapse, I'm talking about letting more light in on a video with actors, that doesn't have fast movement ( think candle light scenes in Barry Lyndon), witch where obliviously shot at 15-18 fps. expeshilly this last one. It's filmed just above the point where it will look choppy.
  10. What I should have said is. Because the t5i can write to the card faster and the processor is better, and more features are running on magic lantern, and higher bit rates and resolutions in raw are possible, if your to shoot things like this with as much detal as humanly possible dose it make a difference?
  11. anyone use an eos m and a t5i? is the t5i all that much better?
  12. out of the t1 to t5i or other DSLRs in the same price range, which one is sharpest in the sense of bitrate.
  13. I'll likely buy a windows install for it. Dose eos m do raw continuous or it limited to like 450 frames, That at this fps and resolution it dose, or dose that, no seems to say the same thing.
  14. my budget for a PC is around a 1000-1500. I've already done 5-6 shorts on point and shots Came out pretty good except the actors I had in them, but what can I say they where free. They came out good But I'm Looking to find my visual stylail that can help tell the stories I want to tell.
  15. I allready plan on getting a desktop I don't like laptops perdiod, but for now it's what I have, in the next month I hope to get one If I have the time.
  16. Mine has adc at 3KHz. I know I won't be happy with it in the end but until I actually get some money to spend I'm going to try to stick with it. I Need to buy A nicer computer first or there's no point, I can't edit much of anything on this without it crashing, thats on a clean OS install, plus It just doesn't even work well for web browsing. That's what happens when you buy a 500 dollar laptop at best buy sense they introduced touch screens even if mine doesn't have one. they cut the Mic jack blue tooth and the hard drive wants to pop out of the body cause they made the cavity slightly too small.
  17. Already have it plus I was going to use on the one I have now to sync audio witch you need in order to sync using audio, the preamp really is bad it even on the lowest level the hiss incredibly high in the mix.
  18. Some cameras don't handle raw video well some can go up to almost 1080 some barly 720. I've herd conflicting stories about witch ones do what even using the same cf or sd cards. The mic is 60. the tri pod is 75. to mic I only plan on using to sync, Cause I don't have a sound man and will be doing things that should have a sound man, But I do have assess to nice recording equipment, and like countless movies I will be redubing in post. And I think the tripod works well enough for me, It's not perfect, but unless I'm getting a more expensive camera, it's not going to be the weak link. I might spend 200 on 2 or 3 lenses but I'm not getting lenses made after the mid 90s at the most. I forgot to mention I'll most likely get a metabones witch will make the image sharper boost a stop, and get most of the field of view back. Even with out one I've taken plenty shaper picture on 18 dollar sears lens from the 70s witch is buy no means a nice lens, though i'd never use it for a film.
  19. I'd love to have a black majic, red, arri expesshilly arri. But I'm only willing to spend a 1000 US price including tripod -75, mic -60, lenes -200, audio recorder - 100 that makes 435 so 565 left. so I don't have 800 to spend.
  20. On another note witch camera handles raw best? 60d, t4i, t5i?
  21. what is the bitrate for the t5i, 60d? all intra? I can't find an answer to that.
  22. k-01 is not the same camera as that I would likely be happy with k1 though. this is what i have. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentax_K-01
×
×
  • Create New...