Jump to content

Arthur Sanchez

Basic Member
  • Posts

    169
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Arthur Sanchez

  1. OK... what to do with, yet another white elephant. It's a modified REX 1 with 200' foot load capacity. I got this long ago... works great... but was thinking of making it available. Either like it is or converting it to super 16mm or something.

     

    Anybody have any thoughts or suggestions on this?

     

    Arthur!

     

     

    post-71166-0-62627400-1499785256_thumb.jpg

  2. In the final dressing of the gate corners and new extended edges for Super16mm, I was careful to use a thin piece of smooth file steel. In that instance it was the handle end of a very small flat file.

    Yes, I do the same except the inside corner radius of the gate matches the radius corner of my tool.... also the tool is ultra highly polished with a zero abrasion factor.

     

    Arthur

  3. I guess it's for the 10% (or less?) cinemagoers... who rarely experience the sense of being part of a large enraptured audience.

    That's where it all began as we remember... the movie theater. that bigger than life image...

     

    I found in my years of research into why film is how it is... and my findings were that 24 fps is just the right frame rate to deliver the suspension of disbelief or willing suspension of disbelief has been defined as a willingness to suspend one's critical faculties and believe the unbelievable; sacrifice of realism and logic for the sake of enjoyment. By shooting basic film you get this effect. BAM simple as that!

  4. ... are a means to an end. They are not actually intended for projection or for making contact prints. They have blossomed in recent years because scanning has so much improved and it's now possible to extract all the information.

    Very good point... advancements in technologies that the millennials along with others (self included) have embraced. That's why all the modifications are not done by hand! Rather Precision CNC technology...

  5. Oh Simon... I agree with everything you've mentioned... but that was then and now things have changed...

     

    Film is just the capture mechanism... the camera can withstand the changes. Adapting to newer trending image formats allows you to expand into that world.

     

    Living is the old school puritan sense is fine... But there is a natural evolution happening and Bolex is a mighty enough camera to grow.

     

    so, I bought my own professional machine shop to do the work.

     

    just my opinion.

  6. I assume you are shooting film...

    Have you tried a more narrow shutter ... Adjusting the shutter speed.

    Also, matching the frame rate of the TV footage to the frame rate be shot.

     

    that's my experience with shooting a CRT or a TV set and not have rolling or other artifacts.

     

    Arthur!

  7. W

     

    Never know that you could do single system sound in a EBM, camera noise would have been a problem on what is a MOS camera.

     

    ell wouldn't that be the same as audio from a film projector...the sync point is far enough (actually the same distance) away so that it glides smoothly over the sound head.

     

    As for camera noise... well yeah, you might be more limited... shot something louder than the camera would be perfect!

  8. Hello Everyone....

     

    OK I found this EBM the is setup to record audio on to 16mm film while shooting...

    Well that's one way to get SYNC sound... It all looks very complete, but would anyone, today, still use this device?

     

    The reason I ask is that I'm planning to remove it... but it seems a shame to trash such vintage technology.

     

    any thoughts on this opportunity?

     

    Arthur!

     

    post-71166-0-71454600-1495723334_thumb.jpg

    post-71166-0-79636000-1495723348_thumb.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...