Jump to content

Michael Hammond

Basic Member
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Michael Hammond

  1. Thanks very much David - you bring up some really good points. Specifically to remind me that there's always a trade-off when it comes to lighting. When we change one thing accomplish something we want, and then we need to change other things to work with that decision. Your answer about white and black tiles brings up a related question I have about camera sensors. Generally speaking, when it's said that we need to expose for the sensor we're talking about giving that sensor enough light to be clean - or as clean as possible if that's the look we're going for. If we expose for the white tiles, the black tiles are going to fall below what we might think of as an acceptable exposure level. Why wouldn't that give noise in the black tiles? Is it because we're giving the sensor an overall amount of light and therefore it has enough info to work with for the entire picture? Asked another way, if I film a black room with no light the image is going to be FPN, and all sorts of terrible electronic noise. If I shot a well lit white room the picture will be very clean. When I mix these two in a scene - a well lit person, and areas where very little light is present in order to get dark shadows - why wouldn't the dark areas get noisy? Especially if I light close to a 2.8 for a 2.8 lens.
  2. Hi everyone, First post here! I have a question about getting dramatic lighting without noise in the shadows. Here's the hypothetical: Say I'm going for a dramatic scene, lots of shadows. And let's also say the talent includes one person in the scene, sitting in a chair in a dark room. There are a couple of practicals in the scene so there's going to be more light than just a key and key/fill on the talent's face and body. I'm using a 2.8 lens and I don't want to shoot wide open so I decide I'm going to key the actor at a 4.0. I set my lighting to do so, set my iris to 4.0 and viola - talent looks nice with an overhead softbox with a grid shining light down on them, and on their area only. Meanwhile, other areas in the scene that aren't filled with practicals and their accompanying ambient light (which isn't much compared to my overhead softbox) goes into deep shadow. Well, there's the look I'm going for but now those areas are underexposed. And now there's going to be noise in the shot in those areas. I can increase the light output of the overhead softbox and the practicals to get more light to the sensor. But to keep the talent at the right exposure I need to stop the camera down so all that additional light is basically going back to the same levels with some underexposure issues happening due to a larger f-stop. Is my recourse going to be using more light for a clean shot and then darkening in post? As long as my ratio of key to practicals to shadows is where I want it, this should work? And if the scene is in a larger room than in my attached example (more space in between the light sources) would I add something like an ambient fill above the scene and then darken in post? In the attached jpeg of a quick and dirty setup, I'm at a 3.2 f-stop with a 2 stop ND filter. Thanks for any feedback on this!
  • Create New...