Premium Member Stephen Williams Posted December 29, 2007 Premium Member Share Posted December 29, 2007 Hi All, There is a reason why the quantity of lithium batteries on an aircraft is limited, I know understand why they are in the same class as dynamite. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=WeWq6rWzChw Stephen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valerio Sacchetto Posted December 29, 2007 Share Posted December 29, 2007 Impressive. A must see for all the teenagers that lounge on their bed chatting on their laptop :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Alessandro Machi Posted December 29, 2007 Premium Member Share Posted December 29, 2007 Does an uncharged lithium ion battery pose same danger, less danger, or no danger? Are we allowed to ship the tiny lithium batteries that go with mini-dv cameras? If so, uncharged or it does not matter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Stephen Williams Posted December 29, 2007 Author Premium Member Share Posted December 29, 2007 Does an uncharged lithium ion battery pose same danger, less danger, or no danger? Are we allowed to ship the tiny lithium batteries that go with mini-dv cameras? If so, uncharged or it does not matter? Hi, I don't think the state of charge has any bearing of the danger. My understanding is no. Stephen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Stephen Williams Posted December 29, 2007 Author Premium Member Share Posted December 29, 2007 Any fire in an aircraft is a memorable experience. There are two aspects of a lithium metal fire that make such a fire extremely hazardous on an aircraft. The first is that lithium burns at a very high temperature, and the normal aircraft fire suppression systems are ineffective against a lithium fire. This is from the FAA: ?A relatively small fire source is sufficient to start a primary lithium battery fire. The outer plastic coating easily melts and fuses adjacent batteries together and then ignites, contributing to the fire intensity. This helps raise the battery temperature to the self-ignition temperature of lithium. Once the lithium in a single battery begins to burn, it releases enough energy to ignite adjacent batteries. This propagation continues until all batteries have been consumed. ?Halon 1301, the fire suppression agent installed in transport category aircraft, is ineffective in suppressing or extinguishing a primary lithium battery fire. Halon 1301 appears to chemically interact with the burning lithium and electrolyte, causing a color change in the molten lithium sparks, turning them a deep red instead of the normal white. This chemical interaction has no effect on battery fire duration or intensity. ?The air temperature in a cargo compartment that has had a fire suppressed by Halon 1301 can still be above the autoignition temperature of lithium. Because of this, batteries that were not involved in the initial fire can still ignite and propagate. ?The ignition of a primary lithium battery releases burning electrolyte and a molten lithium spray. The cargo liner material may be vulnerable to perforation by molten lithium, depending on its thickness. This can allow the Halon 1301 fire suppressant agent to leak out of the compartment, reducing the concentration within the cargo compartment and the effectiveness of the agent. Holes in the cargo liner may also allow flames to spread outside the compartment. ?The ignition of primary lithium batteries releases a pressure pulse that can raise the air pressure within the cargo compartment. The ignition of only a few batteries was sufficient to increase the air pressure by more than 1 psi in an airtight 10-meter-cubed pressure vessel. Cargo compartments are only designed to withstand approximately a 1-psi pressure differential. The ignition of a bulk-packed lithium battery shipment may compromise the integrity of the compartment by activating the pressure relief panels. This has the same effect as perforations in the cargo liner, allowing the Halon 1301 fire suppressant to leak out, reducing its effectiveness.? Full text: http://www.icao.int/anb/fls/dangerousgoods...6/WPs/WP.36.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Alessandro Machi Posted December 29, 2007 Premium Member Share Posted December 29, 2007 If I am recalling this correctly a lithium ion battery must weigh less than 2 pounds to be brought onboard an airplane. So the tiny batteries on a mini-dv camcorder, are they considered acceptable to ship via fed-ex, onboard a plane, in the baggage area? I'm curious if the specs are different for going onboard an airplane with a lithium ion battery versus what one puts in baggage. It seems really dangerous to put a lap top in baggage since they are kind of fragile to begin with, could get damaged, ignite and nobody would be aware??? Is it "safer" to put a laptop where it can be seen (on board) versus in baggage where if it was damaged and acted up nobody would really know about it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Michael Nash Posted December 30, 2007 Premium Member Share Posted December 30, 2007 If I am recalling this correctly a lithium ion battery must weigh less than 2 pounds to be brought onboard an airplane. So the tiny batteries on a mini-dv camcorder, are they considered acceptable to ship via fed-ex, onboard a plane, in the baggage area? I'm curious if the specs are different for going onboard an airplane with a lithium ion battery versus what one puts in baggage. It seems really dangerous to put a lap top in baggage since they are kind of fragile to begin with, could get damaged, ignite and nobody would be aware??? Is it "safer" to put a laptop where it can be seen (on board) versus in baggage where if it was damaged and acted up nobody would really know about it? http://www.cinematography.com/forum2004/in...c=28082&hl= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Stephen Williams Posted December 30, 2007 Author Premium Member Share Posted December 30, 2007 Hi All, Remember to count the Lithium-ion batteries in your cell phone, laptop & still camera before calculating how many (if any) additional batteries you can take on board. Stephen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Michael Nash Posted December 31, 2007 Premium Member Share Posted December 31, 2007 Hi All, Remember to count the Lithium-ion batteries in your cell phone, laptop & still camera before calculating how many (if any) additional batteries you can take on board. Stephen The rules seem to say that "installed" batteries in such devices are acceptable; it's the number/mass of spare batteries they place a limit on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Alessandro Machi Posted December 31, 2007 Premium Member Share Posted December 31, 2007 What about when shipping via a courier such as Fed-Ex? I'm supposed to ship a compact DV camcorder to someone. At the moment neither battery is on the camera. The batteries are very tiny, they easily fit in the palm of a hand. Do I have to avoid shredded paper as packing material and instead use something non-flammable? What would be considered non-flammable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Michael Nash Posted December 31, 2007 Premium Member Share Posted December 31, 2007 Tim included some links in the post I quoted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Alessandro Machi Posted December 31, 2007 Premium Member Share Posted December 31, 2007 Paper or styrofoam pellets, is one less flammable than the other? There appears to be conflicting data over whether the batteries should be left mounted to the camera or not. One place says keep the batteries in baggies or it's original packaging, and another sources says the batteries should be attached to an actual piece of equipment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug Okamoto Posted January 1, 2008 Share Posted January 1, 2008 The limits apply to both spare and installed batteries. Read here: http://safetravel.dot.gov/whats_new_batteries.html for more information. Basically you can bring any installed battery (up to 8 grams of lithium content) as a carry on (within the airline limits) or in checked baggage (as long as the device is locked off). You are limited to 2 spare batteries up to 25 grams of lithium content total. For a lithium metal battery the limit is 2 grams (per battery) and that is pertaining to both spare and installed. I think the most common application now a days are watch batteries and pacemakers but some toys use them as well in permanent installations. Note when the TSA is refering to lithium batteries, they are talking about lithium-ion batteries. When they are refering to lithium metal batteries, they are talking about the old style lithium batteries where the lithium metal itself is the anode. Graphite is usually used commercially now and the lithium ions are inserted into that. I hope this clears things up, I had to work my brain around this one to finally figure it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Alessandro Machi Posted January 1, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted January 1, 2008 Passing the buck. Basically, if you declare dangerous goods, FedEx has NONE of the merchandise one would need to ship the item. You need a special container that FedEx does not sell, warning stickers which FedEx does not have, and a special form to fill out that one downloads from the internet, because FedEx does not stock them. Then you pay a 35 dollar additional charge. I would suggest that the airlines and the delivery companies are possibly passing the buck. Why not just install a small vaccuum steel box in the cargo hold with a temperature indicator. Ok, that will cost money. But so what, how about we put fellow country people back to work rather than just pass the cost on to the end user. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Stephen Williams Posted January 2, 2008 Author Premium Member Share Posted January 2, 2008 Hi All, Bear in mind professional equipment is not covered by the wording used in sub-section 2.3 of the IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations. Table 2.3.A expressly refers to "Consumer Electronic Devices" and not to professional equipment. Airlines typically permit professional equipment under the scope of these regulations to a certain degree, however, this is actually good will on the side of the airlines. Stephen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now