Premium Member Tim O'Connor Posted January 1, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted January 1, 2008 In the credits for "The Last King Of Scotland" Panavision is credited as the camera system but in the behind the scenes footage that I saw, there were definitely Arris and maybe something else at one point but nothing that looked like any camera from Panavision. Also, I've heard somewhere that the movie is not exclusively Super 16mm as reported but has some 35mm. footage. Does anybody know about this? I read a post somewhere that claimed that some of the early footage in the story in Scotland is in 35mm.. Also, in one of the behind the scenes shots in Uganda, I caught a quick glimpse of what looked like an Arri BL-3 or BL-4 (It was partially obscured so I couldn't tell even on a freeze frame but the part of the mag that I saw looked a lot more like a 35mm. BL mag. than the back of one of the SRs I saw on several other behind the scenes shots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member John Brawley Posted January 1, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted January 1, 2008 In the credits for "The Last King Of Scotland" Panavision is credited as the camera system but in the behind the scenes footage that I saw, there were definitely Arris Panavision rent Arri's and are Arri's biggest customer. jb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Tim O'Connor Posted January 1, 2008 Author Premium Member Share Posted January 1, 2008 Panavision rent Arri's and are Arri's biggest customer. jb Oh, it's a credit for Panavision the company and not its cameras per se. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Sweetman Posted January 1, 2008 Share Posted January 1, 2008 Also I don't think it's uncommon to see a mix of both brands of camera on any given medium-to-large-budget production, where you might have the luxury of multiple cameras for different purposes and applications. I guess the fact that panavision buys arri cameras explains that too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member David Mullen ASC Posted January 1, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted January 1, 2008 Also I don't think it's uncommon to see a mix of both brands of camera on any given medium-to-large-budget production, where you might have the luxury of multiple cameras for different purposes and applications. I guess the fact that panavision buys arri cameras explains that too. Panavision buys 35mm MOS Arris like the 435 and 235 because they make no equivalent. But the 35mm sync-sound cameras they carry are usually their own Panaflexes. However, in Super-16, they only made a few Elaines (a shrunken Panaflex, only really good for studio work, like for sitcoms) so they also have Aatons and whatnot for rent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Tim O'Connor Posted January 5, 2008 Author Premium Member Share Posted January 5, 2008 Panavision buys 35mm MOS Arris like the 435 and 235 because they make no equivalent. But the 35mm sync-sound cameras they carry are usually their own Panaflexes. However, in Super-16, they only made a few Elaines (a shrunken Panaflex, only really good for studio work, like for sitcoms) so they also have Aatons and whatnot for rent. Thanks, David. I didn't even know that Panaflex doesn't have MOS cameras. I have heard of the Elaine and was pretty excited to think about a 16mm Panaflex camera until I saw pictures of them on sets and realized that they pretty much stay in sitcom type environments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member John Brawley Posted January 5, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted January 5, 2008 Thanks, David. I didn't even know that Panaflex doesn't have MOS cameras. I have heard of the Elaine and was pretty excited to think about a 16mm Panaflex camera until I saw pictures of them on sets and realized that they pretty much stay in sitcom type environments. Don't forget that the Aaton XTR PROD was originally going to be a Panavision "rental only" camera. Panavision used to own a part of Aaton and had a large hand in the development of the XTR Prod. jb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kar Wai Ng Posted January 5, 2008 Share Posted January 5, 2008 Thanks, David. I didn't even know that Panaflex doesn't have MOS cameras. Well, there's the Panastar, but that's rather obsolete. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Clarke Posted January 5, 2008 Share Posted January 5, 2008 Panavision London rent Arricams. You can even have them fitted with PV mounts. That's how Casino Royale was supplied (shooting on S4's). When JDC was bought up by Panavision, they acquired all their Arricams. The current Harry Potter is shooting on Arricams from Panavision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now