Guest Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 Here's an interesting article on DOPs who become directors, some permanently and others not so permanently. Good info: http://www.dailyfilmdose.com/2008/08/when-...ers-direct.html R, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Rakoczy Posted October 23, 2008 Share Posted October 23, 2008 (edited) "But what I really want to do is Direct"... Great article Richard. Thanks for sharing. It also reminded me of the many Directors who think they are Directors of Photography. :o Edited October 23, 2008 by David Rakoczy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 24, 2008 Share Posted October 24, 2008 "But what I really want to do is Direct"... Great article Richard. Thanks for sharing. It also reminded me of the many Directors who think they are Directors of Photography. :o Yes good point. One my next movie I will have a DOP. He's not going to have a very fun shoot is he? :lol: R, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benson Marks Posted October 24, 2008 Share Posted October 24, 2008 (edited) Does George Stevens count? I didn't find him in that article and I do know he wasn't just a DOP and director, but also a writer and producer. Anybody else think that George should've been mentioned too? Edited October 24, 2008 by Benson Marks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Lowe Posted October 24, 2008 Share Posted October 24, 2008 Just for the record, Robert Rodriguez was not a legit, working DP who later became a director. I think one of the reasons this rarely happens is that someone who is a director by nature would have a difficult time as a working DP, because, let's face it, he or she would always be wanting or trying to direct! :lol: I know this is a sweeping generalization, but there might be some truth to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Wells Posted October 24, 2008 Share Posted October 24, 2008 I think one of the reasons this rarely happens is that someone who is a director by nature would have a difficult time as a working DP, because, let's face it, he or she would always be wanting or trying to direct! :lol: I know this is a sweeping generalization, but there might be some truth to it. After I shot my one feature - which I also photographed, "Indie" directors I know said very complimentary things about how I shot it; but when I suggested they could hire me I often got a cold shoulder - I realized it could be the were afraid I'd try & play director.... which is as far from the truth as you can get, why would I want the hardest job in the world too ? I suppose I'm a filmmaker who is 'a cinematographer by nature' in distinction here. -Sam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Hayes Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 I think one of the reasons this rarely happens is that someone who is a director by nature would have a difficult time as a working DP, because, let's face it, he or she would always be wanting or trying to direct! I got to disagree with you here. I?m working DP with thirty features and seven television series under my belt. I?ve also written and directed two feature films. Directing is much harder work then you might think so I primarily work as a DP. The fact that I have directed a couple of films made me a much more supportive and understanding DP. I know what director's need and want. I kind of feel like the big game hunter who is hired to track the lion so his client can kill it. Could I track it and kill it myself? Sure. But that?s not my career. Occasionally the client misses the lion and I have to bring it down before we all die. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Lowe Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 I got to disagree with you here. I?m working DP with thirty features and seven television series under my belt. I?ve also written and directed two feature films. Directing is much harder work then you might think so I primarily work as a DP. The fact that I have directed a couple of films made me a much more supportive and understanding DP. I know what director's need and want. I kind of feel like the big game hunter who is hired to track the lion so his client can kill it. Could I track it and kill it myself? Sure. But that?s not my career. Occasionally the client misses the lion and I have to bring it down before we all die. Bob, that makes sense. I was only generalizing, and only doing so on a half-serious note. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex de Campi Posted October 27, 2008 Share Posted October 27, 2008 ....Although I do know of a few DPs who have directed projects (extremely well, to prestigious award level) and then gone back to DP'ing.... and found directors didn't want to hire them because they (the directors) felt insecure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 27, 2008 Share Posted October 27, 2008 I would also like to see some data on the number of editors who have become directors. There are quite a few of the great directors who started out as editors, like David Lean and Robert Wise (Wise actually edited Citizen Kane!!). Plus there are a number of big directors that cut their own work, like James Cameron. I have always felt that the editors position is closer to the directors chair than the DOP is. Mainly because the editor develops a good understanding of the language and grammar of film. Many will disagree of course mainly because the editor is not on set. R, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominic Cochran Posted October 27, 2008 Share Posted October 27, 2008 Crazy they left Caleb Deschanel off when he continues to work in both capacities with success. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Justin Hayward Posted October 28, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted October 28, 2008 I have always felt that the editors position is closer to the directors chair than the DOP is. Mainly because the editor develops a good understanding of the language and grammar of film. Many will disagree of course mainly because the editor is not on set. R, No, I agree. One of the most important qualities a director can have is knowing what he or she needs for the scene to work. With a good past of editing under their belt, there is nothing but benefits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex de Campi Posted October 28, 2008 Share Posted October 28, 2008 No, I agree too. Having experience of cutting your own work makes you a more honest director. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now