Jump to content

DOPs Who Become Directors


Guest

Recommended Posts

"But what I really want to do is Direct"...

 

Great article Richard. Thanks for sharing. It also reminded me of the many Directors who think they are Directors of Photography. :o

 

Yes good point. One my next movie I will have a DOP. He's not going to have a very fun shoot is he? :lol:

 

R,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for the record, Robert Rodriguez was not a legit, working DP who later became a director.

 

I think one of the reasons this rarely happens is that someone who is a director by nature would have a difficult time as a working DP, because, let's face it, he or she would always be wanting or trying to direct! :lol:

 

I know this is a sweeping generalization, but there might be some truth to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think one of the reasons this rarely happens is that someone who is a director by nature would have a difficult time as a working DP, because, let's face it, he or she would always be wanting or trying to direct! :lol:

 

I know this is a sweeping generalization, but there might be some truth to it.

 

After I shot my one feature - which I also photographed, "Indie" directors I know said very complimentary things about how I shot it; but when I suggested they could hire me I often got a cold shoulder - I realized it could be the were afraid I'd try & play director.... which is as far from the truth as you can get, why would I want the hardest job in the world too ?

 

I suppose I'm a filmmaker who is 'a cinematographer by nature' in distinction here.

 

-Sam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think one of the reasons this rarely happens is that someone who is a director by nature would have a difficult time as a working DP, because, let's face it, he or she would always be wanting or trying to direct!

 

I got to disagree with you here. I?m working DP with thirty features and seven television series under my belt. I?ve also written and directed two feature films. Directing is much harder work then you might think so I primarily work as a DP. The fact that I have directed a couple of films made me a much more supportive and understanding DP. I know what director's need and want. I kind of feel like the big game hunter who is hired to track the lion so his client can kill it. Could I track it and kill it myself? Sure. But that?s not my career. Occasionally the client misses the lion and I have to bring it down before we all die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got to disagree with you here. I?m working DP with thirty features and seven television series under my belt. I?ve also written and directed two feature films. Directing is much harder work then you might think so I primarily work as a DP. The fact that I have directed a couple of films made me a much more supportive and understanding DP. I know what director's need and want. I kind of feel like the big game hunter who is hired to track the lion so his client can kill it. Could I track it and kill it myself? Sure. But that?s not my career. Occasionally the client misses the lion and I have to bring it down before we all die.

 

Bob, that makes sense. I was only generalizing, and only doing so on a half-serious note. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would also like to see some data on the number of editors who have become directors. There are quite a few of the great directors who started out as editors, like David Lean and Robert Wise (Wise actually edited Citizen Kane!!).

 

Plus there are a number of big directors that cut their own work, like James Cameron.

 

I have always felt that the editors position is closer to the directors chair than the DOP is. Mainly because the editor develops a good understanding of the language and grammar of film.

 

Many will disagree of course mainly because the editor is not on set.

 

R,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
I have always felt that the editors position is closer to the directors chair than the DOP is. Mainly because the editor develops a good understanding of the language and grammar of film.

 

Many will disagree of course mainly because the editor is not on set.

 

R,

 

 

No, I agree. One of the most important qualities a director can have is knowing what he or she needs for the scene to work. With a good past of editing under their belt, there is nothing but benefits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...