Demian Barba Posted November 18, 2004 Share Posted November 18, 2004 hi. in the photograph attached , i guess the desaturation and monochrome look is acomplished by art direction, but what about the muddy blacks? i will be shooting in S16mm, and even though a print may never be made, i don't want to relay on telecine to get those blacks. should i try overexposing and then pulling? if so, by how much? and how does pulling affect colors? i will do tests prior to shooting. thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member John Pytlak RIP Posted November 18, 2004 Premium Member Share Posted November 18, 2004 Underexposure is the direction to go if you want "muddy" blacks that lack detail and density. Slight overexposure generally increases shadow detail and gives darker ("richer") blacks. Pull-process may help give the "look" you want by reducing overall contrast. Likewise, use a film like Kodak VISION2 Expression 500T Color Negative Film 7229 if you want to start off with a lower contrast "look", and use underexposure to help "muddy" the blacks: http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/products....4.4.4.10&lc=en Or 7277: http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/products....4.4.4.18&lc=en Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member David Mullen ASC Posted November 18, 2004 Premium Member Share Posted November 18, 2004 You sort of HAVE to rely on the telecine anyway, so why not use it to create the look you want? By which I mean, you could do it all in-camera and all it takes is a few twists of the knob for the colorist to "normalize" the image anyway, so either way, you have to control how the image is being transferred to tape. A lot of this look is art direction and lighting. You could overexpose and pull-process -- maybe even a low-con stock -- to get this creamy look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidSloan Posted November 18, 2004 Share Posted November 18, 2004 I would probably consider shooting something like this on a low con stock like 320T and soften the image further with a soft fx filter, or something similar. A healthy amount of smoke won't hurt either. Why don't you try underexposing the image by a 1/2 stop, maybe more, and process as normal? I think that would be more effective then pulling. Also, your lighting has to be low contrast; in other words make sure you're using the middle part of the curve, of the stock you are using. Good luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demian Barba Posted November 18, 2004 Author Share Posted November 18, 2004 thank you very much for you responses. i though about under exposing, but i am afraid that would increase the grain too much. i would like to use a 200 asa, either 7217 or 7274. could you recomend any low contrast lenses? thanks again demian barba Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demian Barba Posted November 18, 2004 Author Share Posted November 18, 2004 320? that's a good idea. i'll test it as well. thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Wendell_Greene Posted November 18, 2004 Premium Member Share Posted November 18, 2004 Since your shooting S-16 I'd keep the lenses clean and make any adjustments to softening the image by having the colorist add filtration to the telecine gate. You'll have much more flexiblity and control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now